This movie is terrible. But upon reflection today, the premise is actually fascinating. Superman has the best kind of Superman crisis, caused by the limits he places *on himself*. He has the power to remove all nuclear weapons from the world, but should he? This is the kind of thing Lex Luthor could sound very reasonable to be concerned about: what's Superman going to do next? Throw all bombers into the sun? Ground entire airforces? Ban armies? Why is it okay that Superman is *unilaterally *making this decision? Of course at this point the movie turns into the bad kind of Superman movie, one where his problems can be solved by sufficient punching. And then after all the stupid we get this: >I thought I could give you all the gift of the freedom from war, but I was wrong. It’s not mine to give. And there will be peace – there will be peace when the people of this world want it so badly that their governments will have no choice but to give it to them. I suppose Israel and Hamas made me think of this.
World News
Hundreds dead in Israel and Gaza, thousands injured after Hamas launches rockets, Israel declares war
swcollings 12 months ago • 100%
This. Peace cannot come unless the civilians on both sides are loudly and forcefully willing to die rather than kill civilians on the other side. The problems can only be solved on an individual level.
Asklemmy
Probably a stupid question, but will we ever have something like a microwave to make things cold? Is there a reason this can't exist?
swcollings 1 year ago • 87%
You would need to find a way to make food spontaneously emit microwaves so it loses energy and cools off. That probably involves altering the strength of one of the nuclear forces or something.
I'm on the board of a mission that works out of the basement of First Wesleyan on Shelby Ave. in East Nashville. We're offering paid work for unemployed/underemployed people in Nashville. If you know someone who needs some work and would like a community, please [send them our way](https://christouranchor.org/need-work/). If you have an interest in helping mentor folk, we'd love to talk about that, too. We'd also love it if you'd [contribute a job to our database](https://christouranchor.org/have-work/). We all have little jobs around our homes and businesses that we could pay someone to do. Paying a neighbor is a great way to build stronger communities. We meet Wednesdays at 5:30p and you can learn more about us here: https://christouranchor.org/about/
swcollings 1 year ago • 100%
Yes! My thinking is that Riker stayed on the Enterprise as long as he did because Picard is the first male authority figure in his life that he can respect and learn from. Riker is hyper-competent, but he has no sort of relationship with his father, his first captain barely survived a mutiny while performing illegal experiments, he had no problem pushing back on the captain of the Hood doing dangerous stupid things, and he would rather step down than work for Jellico. Not to mention having to phaser a few admirals to death. Riker's whole history is a search for a man he can trust, and he found that in Picard.
So what changed, that he finally gave that up and moved on?
Most of what works in the Star Trek movies evolve from what we know about the characters. Kirk's love for his ship and history with the Klingons, Picard's history with the Borg, Data's struggle with emotions, that sort of thing. What character threads from any of the series could have been picked up and expanded on in movies?
Apparently my church has a sustainability committee. Naturally I must give them thoughts. All I can think of so far are smart thermostats, LEDs, and replacing the monoculture grass with something pollinator-friendly. What else should be considered? Are there obvious common things that can be improved on?
World News
Wagner boss says march on Moscow halted to avoid bloodshed
swcollings 1 year ago • 100%
Prigozhin was being politically displaced by the Ministry of Defense. His only hope was to displace the Ministry of Defense right back. Putin and the rest of the military didn't bite, and Prigozhin's position was strategically untenable. Maybe he could have taken Moscow, but everyone important had already left, and he couldn't hold Moscow once he had it. So he accepted exile over a fight to his certain death, because he's a mercenary and mercenaries don't die for a cause.