Catzilla. Truly a loaf incarnate.

A mild cigar.

This post was reported for spam. For the record, four cross-posts to separate on-topic communities does not constitute spam.

With due respect, it is time to go outside.

When I fall off my routine I lose a ton of progress. That first hundred K after a long rest absolutely sucks for me. I won't run on an injury, but I understand the fear of the pit.

All hail. I was very, very young to this.

Relatable. You know how it is when your sleeves get wet and they kinda stick to your wrists or flop around getting other stuff stuck to them... ugh.

My first night in my freshman dorm, I played this on the upright piano. Excellent decision. Pro tip to the young geeks: nothing waters the flowers like suicidal ideation wrapped in a veneer of artistic integrity. I can't even sing for shit, that's how well it works.

You're right. I'm sorry for taking my frustration with the forum out on you.

Yes, if you throw democracy in the trash, ignore the rights of the unpopular, and pass any law that appeals to today's public morality, then you'll have lots of options. I just don't want to hear you guys complain after this idealism gets spun to fuck you over by corporate lawyers more skillful than your populist politicians. But fuck me for pointing out the logical inconsistencies in the useless seething groupthink machine, I guess. Apparently I only have rights if the public likes me.

We're talking about criminal law. Can you clearly, objectively, without arbitrary valuation of goods or services, define a legal principle which identifies the point at which a health plan cut becomes a crime?

What's your point? That people organize themselves to commit crimes? That risky behavior is more dangerous when it's amplified by concentrated capital? None of this justifies the phenomenal leap you made to say that an employer is responsible for the lives of their employees. None of this is precedent for the further corruption of the justice system into subjectivity and emotional bias.

Can't you see that you're actually making it worse? You go after organizations whose bread and butter is legal entanglement, using legal entanglement as your only weapon. You make the regulatory environment more difficult for startups and SMBs to compete in, and you do nothing but give your (supposed) worst enemies more political tokens with which to negotiate advantageous positions in that environment. Why do you think these corporate elites flush hundreds of millions of dollars sponsoring progressive media outlets? Do you think they're stupid?

I'm going to ignore the insane part of your point where you equated layoffs with murder.

Greed, like hate, is subjective. It is therefore, like hate, a terrible prerequisite for the activation of the criminal justice system. The idea that motivations for crimes should change the definition and/or penalty of those crimes has fostered popular corruption of the justice system since its inception. Industrialization has accelerated the adoption of human fears into that justice system, to the point where we can no longer even count the number of infractions under the law.

Adding more subjective emotional consideration to a punitive system which is already weighed down beyond the ability to enact swift justice is the opposite of helpful.

Individual data points like "I take pilates", "I work nights and weekends", and "I live in Smalltown, ST" might not mean anything on their own, but if you can connect this data to a single person, then realize there's only one pilates studio in Smalltown, then look up their hours and notice there's only one day class on weekdays, you can make a reasonable guess as to a regular time when a person is away from home. This is called data brokerage.

This is a comically contrived example; the real danger is in the association of countless data points spread across millions of correlated identities. It's not just your data, it's the association of your data with that of your friends and family. Most people are constantly streaming their location, purchases, beliefs, and affiliations out to anyone who cares enough to look. Bad actors may collate their data and use it to take advantage of them, and the only move they have is to ask for prohibitive legislation. As if we don't already have prohibitive legislation.

Anonymity is expensive, inconvenient, and fragile, but it's the only mechanism that protects individuals from the information economy, which I would put right next to ecology in terms of critical 21st-22nd century social problems. It also helps us resist censorship, but that's a different essay.

He cannot protec
Nor can he attac
But he is a little hat

And Jesus said, "verily, I say unto you, know thy audience."

There are people who think they understand olives but have never tasted kalamatas. Sad but true. Great post OP; you made me get up to eat.

First of all, all hail the pirate kings who release exploits to the public. Private property is the root of all natural rights. You have the right to do as you like with your property. Because of this, so do powerful jerks like Elon Musk.

In The Overcriminalization of Social and Economic Conduct, which is well worth the hour read, Paul Rosenzweig describes how industrialization changed the definition of crime in the United States. Roughly, proof of criminal intent is no longer required to convict those who supervise negative outcomes of industrial processes. This trend has two main sources of support: the general public, whose fear of new ideas is sauved by splashy performances of strong legislation and decisive justice, and the established industrial titans whose business in this country has been defined by legislative entanglement since the beginning.

When The Zucc went to Congress and asked Fed Daddy to pwease wegulate him harder, progressives and reactionaries congratulated each other on their bipartisan agreement that we should give him what he wants. Mark even mentioned that he was only asking because Meta has enough lawyers that it doesn't make a difference to them. Meanwhile, the inherent complexity of a bloated regulatory environment is startup pesticide. So, the left gets to say they regulated a corporation, the right gets to say they cleaned up the internet, Congress™ gets to write a bunch of precedent for more Congress™ later, and Meta gets to do the only thing it ever cared about: grow.

Back to Piracy vs. Tech Dad. Everywhere I look, I see calls to warp the law in order to get socialish revenge on this cartoon character. Isn't is possible that we're stuck in a cycle of injustice? I don't like tehniques like secure boot, soft locks, or DRM, and it's scary as hell to see them being introduced to automobiles packed with always-online cameras, but let's be honest with ourselves. Every time something goes wrong, we call for criminal code. Batteries not working as advertised? That's a tax penalty, somehow. You coded integration between your car company and your social media app? You're a trust now: bend over and prepare for nationalization. Elon is not relatable, yet it's too easy to sit back and say you would open yourself up to the public in his place. Meanwhile, both sides go on banning everything they dislike.

We owe it to ourselves and our fellow citizens to be rational about the business environment we create in a democracy. By all means, jailbreak your shit, but also strongly consider whether your comments contributed to the lock in the first place.

Alright this is the most neurotic thing I've ever written but the lizard primary->accent color map is

'((light . dark)
  (medium . dark)
  (dark . medium))

and at first I thought it would be more symmetrical if either the light lizards had medium accents or the medium lizards had light accents, but then I noticed that the outline is always dark, which lets the outline act as both the background and either the primary or accent color for every possible lizard configuration, adding depth. We don't have time to bring color theory into this but I would be remiss if I didn't mention that this piece is inexplicably sepia toned, which raises further questions such as "what is wrong with me" and "how am I going to put this piece in my dining room without having to defend the 1960's?"

Hell yes. Sic semper pingues porcos.

Whole wheat pasta is awesome! You just have to lean into it. Introduce a little more acid to cut the added earth taste. Immediately after draining, squeeze some citrus or drizzle a tiny bit of vinegar over the pasta and let it cool for like two minutes while you finish your sauce. I do this with semolina as well.

This looks delicious, but it would look more delicious if you tossed the pasta and the veggies in a little bit of sauce, then plated the veggies over extra sauce over the pasta.

Relatable. Obviously completely unacceptable behavior. Yet relatable.

My pet theory is that NGINX was designed by a pen-tester who realized that all they needed to do to make the majority of SMBs expose their web servers to the internet was outperform Apache

About seven years ago, I quit dexmethylphenidate after eight years of various stimulants. I wish I could tell you there's a general solution, but I was just reading a completely unrelated book and had to get up, log into Lemmy, and respond to this thread I skimmed past three hours ago. I do take caffeine (~400mg) and nicotine (~6-10mg) daily, as well as a drop of hemp oil weekly to manage the caffeine side effects, so I might be disqualified according to some, but I don't think so. I'm sorry, but nothing will ever approach the unconditional dopamine of strong CNS stims.

Diet and exercise are essential. If I neglect them, I can fall into a loop of unproductive behavior. I mostly eat seeds, legumes, and veggies, with plenty of grain to facilitate cardio. I run 5-10K three times a week. I take protein (pea) and fiber (psyllium) supplements on top of a battery of vitamins. All of this helps me maintain a balance of stable productivity, but honestly the most life-changing thing I've ever done was get to a point in my career where I'm allowed to be productive on my own terms.

It took me until I was 26 to find a job where I was allowed to work mostly alone and be measured by my overall productivity instead of being graded by the horseshit pseudoscience that passes for academics and middle management. Obviously that's not much help to you if you don't have it yet, but please hold out. Don't listen to the horde of people with a work ethic in place of a philosophy. I fucked up or walked away from so many opportunities. You can still find independence. Society needs divergent thinkers, they just don't like to advertise it.

There are still days when I can't get anything done. There are times like this when I abandon what I'm supposed to be doing and fixate on something that really isn't part of the plan. My solution is to practice discipline generally so that I can forgive myself for wandering occasionally. I hope this isn't too disappointing. Take baby steps and trust no removed.

That's a good thing. Discord is chugging its way through the last half of the Web 2.0 service to social media pipeline. It's a VC-funded multimedia enterprise extended around a novel technology core optimized for its original service offering, real-time voice/text. Nobody is immune to bloat, but because Matrix is a protocol standard, not an app, users have the option of sticking with minimal clients and servers that won't (necessarily) get destroyed by feature creep.

If you've tried Element and thought "ah, slow Discord," maybe have a scroll through https://matrix.org/ecosystem/clients/. I don't want to get off topic but all my favorite software is standard/specification-based.

https://adarkroom.doublespeakgames.com/

Don't wait in town.

Looks to me like some karma farmers figured out the Lemmy API

Is this a screenshot of a Reddit post of a screenshot of a Twitter thread about people who want you to know they're involved in literature? I'm just checking. You guys see the same thing, right? This isn't some kind of software bug or dimensional rift?

I think I enjoy the feeling of committing algo to muscle memory more than I do actually developing them. Whenever I get my hands on a new form factor I'm always frustrated by the process of getting used to the new mechanisms. For me it's about the flow state. Does any of this resonate with you?

All it is necessary to do is to abolish all other forms of taxation until the weight of taxation rests upon the value of land irrespective of improvements, and take the ground-rent for the public benefit.
~ Henry George, Social Problems

Home slice I respect the grind but I gotta be real with you I haven't bought a GPU since the Obama administration

Oh my God! That's awful! Which ones?! Which sites, specifically, though?! You know, so I can call for bans.

I didn't know freedom meant people doing stuff that sucks. I was thinking more of a "choose your own cellphone carrier" thing.

I have an idea. Every time there's a disagreement about what forms of expression count as "limiting the freedoms of others," we'll call you up and have you make a ruling. Of course that's a lot of work for one person, so let's erect arbitrary, temporary, economically limited, pseudo-representative democracy in order to elect a committee of people responsible for those decisions. Of course we'll need a way to quickly identify them as the special people ─ those whose senses of morality are elevated above all the rest of us rabble ─ maybe some tiny hats? We'll make sure to pick a shape of hat that hasn't yet been used to propel a civilization towards genocide.

edit: I've got it! Armbands.

It’s also not clear how the law will be enforced or to what extent.

No shit. Isn't that the point? Use outrage to justify the growth of an impenetrable body of law addressing all social and economic behavior, then selectively enforce subjective interpretations to satisfy powerful groups and remain in power. So it goes for any population center whose rapid growth creates the illusion of independence.

Can we sell NYC to Canada yet? We'd make a bundle, they wouldn't even be mad, and I'd sleep a lot better with the border of a superpower between me and a stack of nine million people who think privacy is a sin.

Well pardon me if I politically digress in the LOTR memes group, but it might get worse before it gets better. Encryption, for example, is an inherent existential threat to authoritarianism, and there is global bipartisan support for law which would (or already did) criminalize it under broad or subjective circumstances. The exponential growth of industry puts massive economic strain on political systems, and those explicitly designed to be procedurally overthrown (via representative democracy, for example) may adapt by creating unconstitutional political tokens such as, just off the top of my head, internal revenue systems designed to destabilize opponents' campaign finance systems, aggressive zoning practices intended to control demography, and deficit spending courtesy of international geopolitical entanglement backed by informally declared unconventional warfare.

It's irrational to refrain from criticizing the left wing, which, in the US, supports all of the above practices when the White House is blue. So does the right when it's red. We have to get past this shit. Industry exacerbates otherwise manageable resource asymmetry. We need to put our cultural differences on hold while we purge the bias and clientelism from our internal revenue systems. Only then will this pressure to enforce subjective values subside to a level where it can be managed by individuals and their technology.