>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3>:3

Stan Rogers song 'Lies' is one I find really poetic and uplifting on this exact topic

Eh, rabbit could be cis. Up to rabbit to tell us how they identify. Sometimes men like to look pretty too :3

Also surgery. But we're capable of knowing which homonym is meant by context ;)

Eh, you wouldn't use the noun water to refer to atoms of water. 'How many waters are there?' to refer to atoms of water is the statement of someone deranged

And yet you opened the image they sent 🤨📸

Depends on if you're using water to include types of water (if, like a maniacal madman, you have mixed Evian, Buxton and Harrogate mineral water into one jug). Then 'i mixed fewer waters' or 'there are fewer waters in that glass' would be valid.

To be clear: I'm not the person you replied to, just someone who finds it quite interesting (in the same way that the plural fishes is valid if you're talking about different species of fish).

And yes, I know prescriptivism is bad, but also it is quite fun.

Does that mean chatgpt considers me a beautiful woman 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺

Not really --the reason being that no-one would play this who is experienced at the game, and I'll do my best to explain why:

1. Black's bishops are incredibly passive. If you're going to sit back and let white take the centre, generally you're going to stick the bishops on the long diagonal so you have long-term compensation (as in e.g. the King's Indian). On the long diagonal (a1-h8 or a8-h1), the bishop is always going to apply pressure to the centre, and once the centre opens control a lot of key squares.

Compare that to black's bishops here. Which squares are they looking at? Not ones you particularly care about. You are completely free to carry on developing, then play e4, clamping down on the centre.

2. Black's knights are doing nothing. You may have heard the phrase 'a knight on the rim is dim'. Black's knight on h7 is doing not very much, while yours are controlling key central squares (the one on d2 prepares e4).

3. Pawn structure. Generally in an opening like the King's Indian, black prepares pawn moves like e5, c5 or f5 to strike back at white's centre, and when the centre opens their great pieces (like a fianchettoed bishop or active Knights) can take advantage. Your opponent doesn't have any pieces geared towards making these pawn breaks useful. e5 loses a pawn, d5 opens up your dark squared bishop, c5 can be ignored and allows you to apply pressure to the weak d6 pawn.

The bottom line is: black has wasted a lot of their time, and you are developed and ready to crack their position. In terms of how to press an advantage, many people overbalance and try to push too hard. The best way to punish passive play is to finish developing (Qe2, and put the rooks on d1 and e1), then pick a side to attack on, and gear yourself towards pushing pawns, and manoeuvring your pieces to support those breaks. Your opponent is hoping you overextend and collapse; don't give them the satisfaction. Good luck!

They're referring to this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Name_(brand)

Fingers crossed!

The sheer pleasure in watching an arrogant tit get humbled was chef's kiss. Once by someone who couldn't give a shit about him, and was good enough to simply crush him the first few games and then dick about, and once by someone who really wanted a statement victory

It funny because yesterday the chess did not, in fact, speak for itself

I read that as courting. Which honestly... Yeah?

Br*tish person detected smh my head.

I watched that yesterday. Was kinda on edge as to whether it was going to be done well or not, but think it was navigated reasonably well for the 2000s.

It's no good to me if everyone expects me to top T_T

Do you know if I can donate some?

I wish T.T I'm 6'6''

Seems to be the general consensus. Thanks all for the help!

She truly is that girl 😞

Yeah, being stopped by the police is unlikely, but when the norm and the law is for people to cycle on the road rather than the pavement it leads pedestrians to wander round without watching for cyclists, which in turn means you have to cycle slowly to be prepared for someone to step out in front of you.

It's illegal to cycle on the pavement in many countries, and it's a danger to pedestrians.

Where? I never saw them there, but equally didn't go far from the centre

Honestly, yea. Envy seeing friends having fun going charity shopping when you have leg dimensions 28W/38L is a horror story all its own. At least cute tops are doable

UK: never seen a taco bell or dunking donuts

They are in many ways more powerful than violence. See the failure of the Kapp Putsch to see them in direct opposition.

See also the glorious revolution

The contrapoints video on cringe touches on her near the start. IMO it's a topic that's kinda sad.

Northampton resident detected. Your opinion is invalid.

Could also be I am the Doctor

Reminds me of the album covers by a band called Flook :)

She pegs him good n hard

Always glad to see a fellow beef head out in the wild. Beef out!

History podcasts I like:

Revolutions. Well known; Mike Duncan goes through various revolutions through history in an excellent, detailed narrative.

American History Too!: two academics from the university of Glasgow have various guests on to discuss different topics from American history. They know their stuff and are really charismatic.

In Our Time: BBC podcast that's been going since the early 2000s. A panel of academics are interviewed and discuss a topic on which they are all experts. Incredibly well researched and interesting, though not especially humorous.

Hrbfhfnfnfhfnfndmgnngnggnghhhhhhhhh

There's any number of reasons. They might have a friend who uses Reddit who sent it to them. They might have replied on Reddit, and also have thought it worth broadcasting to their shitter followers as well. They might browse Reddit on desktop but not have an account.

Yeah, these kind of posts always feel kinda mean if it's not him that's put that caption.

People who aren't conventionally attractive are allowed to have a sense of style and wear fun clothes too.

Everett True wouldn't put up with this shit

It's also just commonly done in UK newspapers. Age and familial status is always given. Terry Pratchett made a joke about it in one of his books, though I can't remember the quote.

Edit: found one (not exactly the gag I wanted but CBA to look further)

'Exc--' he began. But the citizen's eyes had already detected the notebook. 'I saw it all,' he said. 'Did you?' 'It was a ter-ri-ble scene,' said the man, at dictation speed. 'But the watch-man made a deathdefying plunge to res-cue the old lady and he de-serves a med-al.' 'Really?' said William, scribbling fast. 'And you are--' 'Sa-muel Arblaster (43), stonemason, of The Scours,' said the man. 'I saw it too,' said a woman next to him, urgently. 'Mrs Florrie Perry, blonde mother of three, from Dolly Sisters. It was a scene of car-nage.'

huh. Google says American cider is just unfiltered apple juice

I stand by what I said though: hot mulled (alcoholic) cider is great

Him is the guy in the post -- Tim Walz