Does anybody have a beginner Korean war/DPRK reading list.

Ever heard of culture, fulfillment, interest, or entertainment?

Remove Raj and it's all based

Mainly because it is weird to walk up to someone and ask wether they are smart, and even if they reply you can't trust someone's personal judgement about themselves.

A good place to look for like-minded people that you can discuss intellectual subjects with are reading circles. They're also a great way to read more theory and understand it.

The problem is that there IS a porn INDUSTRY that commodities bodies

The USA currently haves a foothold in Cuba and it is a literal concentration camp

WW2 was a conflict where the allies killed a bunch of people just because they disagreed on some borders smh

The japanese were prepared to surrender after the Soviet invasion of Manchuria, not the bombs. The bombs were dropped due to cold war politics. They were practically just a stunt to scare Soviets.

Well I enjoy the game, but the community definitely is cancer. I guess I'm just part of the minority

Stalin's reputation also improved when the Soviet archives were declassified. These quotes do go well together, well done for spotting this comrade

Regarding the mortgage, the movement, and the instability of its value I do agree that renting will help you with that. But renting will always cost more than having a house(no mortgage) and paying bills, repairs, maintenance, and anything else. This is due to the landlord having to make you pay more than he has to spend to make it profitable. In practically, if someone is a landlord as their only/main source of income (were talking big firms or rich individuals here not people on retirement or anything) they are spending the tenants money for all repairs maintenance and anything else whilst pocketing the surplus/profit.

Of course, in our current capitalist system buying a house straight up is nigh impossible but most people prefer owning a house and will only say they prefer renting because they don't have the income to own a house straight up because of the initial cost, even if it's cheaper long term. Like anything in capitalism, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

Yes this is definitely true, although this is just against kids that don't know the second thing about fascism and what they support. Against people further down the rabbit hole that generally believe this, you must be much more careful and it is a much longer process. With any fascist there's also the risk of them reverting and damaging the left community.

a bit late but I'm getting back into Alien Swarm: Reactive Drop

"leftist media never talks about the Soviet Union"

Daily reminder that MLK was a socialist and his greatest flaw was not going far enough

The tower of London is a tower in London that was historically used by the monarchy as a prison and zoo. It's a pun about giving the Big Ben a new name.

Thanks for the info o7

The most important thing when discussing politics is to be patient. Of course they won't become communists straight away but if you patiently keep on explaining, then over time their opinions will change, at first by small amounts and then later by more significant amounts until they're hopefully communists

Aren't these for climbing at high altitudes where the air is too thin to breathe

Unfortunately it's just a few minutes long so I can just outline the very basics of the topic but I also include a positives and negatives of the USSR bit in it. My hope Is that, since I will present it in front of class, I will be able to give people a view of the union that is it mainly just being a normal country with its own problems but many more positives as well

Lol well I am doing the demonisation of the USSR for my vocational exam presentation

I'm just annoyed that I got muted by the mods, because I understand that I phrased myself poorly but a perma ban seems excessive

To my understanding the government doesn't openly discriminate against Tatars although I have little to zero knowledge on the subject (and even if they are not racist openly there should still be analysis of the laws of the Russian Federation to see whether they structurally discriminate)

The wikipedia article mentioned a singular individual and unnamed institutions, although it wouldn't surprise me if widespread negative sentiment against Tatars did exist(especially considering the stereotypes attributed to them). I am not claiming that it does not exist but that the article doesn't definitely state any widespread sentiment. unfortunately I couldn't read the two sources in the "in modern times" as I can't read russian. although they seemingly were just referencing the actions of the soviet union and not Russia as of today(by soviet union the probably mean Russia anyways as it would be the republics that create autonomous areas and not the union as a whole)

Basically,(Adam claims) the gravel institute portrays their point(US funding Nazis in Ukraine) disingenuously and move the goal posts from the US funding the far right to the far right managing to gain weapons. This is all false as the video made a point of different US officials actively knowing that they are supporting the far right and not trying to stop them from gaining help. Another point Adam makes is that the video cut clips disingenuously but in reality it just used shortened clips without any weird cuts.