CarbonScored 20 hours ago • 100%
Geez, from a prominent Communist party member to a member of modern Russia's ruling United Russia party, what a fall.
CarbonScored 2 days ago • 100%
It was also with a massive group of people. Which makes an entire world of difference.
CarbonScored 2 days ago • 97%
Yes, migrating from Windows to Linux is a learning curve. I totally appreciate it's frustrating, but it just comes down to "you were raised with a different thing."
I just want a normal operating system where I double click an app to activate or install it, and it has full functionality no ifs and or buts
I say this as someone who has spent years as IT support for Windows, Mac and Linux computers respectively. There's no such thing.
cause I want to spend two hours googling how to install non-Linux compatible software on Linux
I mean this is your problem. If you don't want to mess about googling how to do stuff, then use software that's built for the OS you're using??? You'd have infinitely more issues trying to get Windows to run software not designed for it.
My assumption is you're just used to closed Windows software. Linux has its own software and/or native executables for any tasks you'd need to do, and even many (or most??) games nowadays, where you can install/run everything with a double click and don't need to type anything.
Otherwise, if you're reliant on Windows-specific software for some reason, then sorry but you have to live with your costly insecure proprietary invasive nonfunctional OS slop. Instead complain to the developers for taking closed garden single-OS approach when it's actually incredibly easy nowadays to be multiplatform.
CarbonScored 2 days ago • 100%
then, like, isn’t basically every Western leader a “war criminal”
Honestly, I think the best approach one can take in response to hypocritical liberals is yeah, Putin's an asshole war criminal, but sadly the west and NATO are even asshole war criminaler.
CarbonScored 2 days ago • 100%
I mean, that's pretty bad. Only being able to use the API severely restricts the kinds of apps you can install, making a user controlling their own device significantly harder and massively strengthening the hold of the Play Store.
CarbonScored 2 days ago • 100%
Ah, the two fundamental biases as described by Marx, democrat and republican.
CarbonScored 3 days ago • 100%
Couple points to add on to things there: I'm not aware of any Eurocountry where shop workers are allowed to forcefully detain you and/or check your bags, without directly seeing you shoplift, and so long as you don't agree. Even if laws permit it, it's exceedingly rare that workers are allowed to enforce it because of the huge liabilities.
If someone tries to stop you, inform them you won't be detained and that you're leaving, then just leave by any means you peacefully can, even calmly hopping barriers. This is what I do even though I'm not stealing stuff.
Be aware of your rights, any wannabe cop security guards who do actually detain you might be guilty of assault, depending on their actions and local laws, for which you might be able to sue the company, or even just threaten to sue if you're not released.
CarbonScored 3 days ago • 100%
Reactionaries gonna reactionary. The good takeaway is that most people don't really seem to agree with the main parties anyway.
CarbonScored 3 days ago • 100%
Blending chickpeas and little flour can be enough to get a soft 'patty'. Gram (chickpea) flour is a great alternative, which is just chickpeas milled so fine it holds together quite strongly, but can be pricey depending on area.
CarbonScored 3 days ago • 100%
If you don't mind a little spillage, lightly mashed refried beans or (fried) chickpeas go hard in my sandwiches and are proteiny. Or just mash them all the way into bean/chickpea burger for extra togetherness.
CarbonScored 3 days ago • 100%
Genuinely not a bad idea to reduce their power
CarbonScored 3 days ago • 100%
I personally think it's mostly people who really have no consciousness about politics whatsoever.
CarbonScored 3 days ago • 100%
I'm more baffled by the 25% of Tory voters preferring communism. I want to meet these people who support the conservatives but don't actively want fascism??
CarbonScored 3 days ago • 100%
That is actually hecking cool. Despite our shitty electoral politics, there are already a good number of people actually caring about socialism.
CarbonScored 4 days ago • 85%
??? Nobody gets blown up going to NK. And tourists frequently enter by land.
CarbonScored 4 days ago • 100%
"..for poor people only", Ellison finishes. Let's put cameras on the bourgeois class and see what behaviour results.
CarbonScored 4 days ago • 100%
Given the party is one step away from explicitly labelling themselves as fascist, it's not too much of a surprise.
I don't know how meaningful the question really is, and fuck YouGov, but still thought the data were interesting and vaguely positive.
CarbonScored 4 days ago • 100%
TIL humanism is actually impossible because empathy isn't real
CarbonScored 4 days ago • 100%
In my defence, juice can be quite slippy
CarbonScored 1 week ago • 100%
frog
CarbonScored 1 week ago • 100%
Hah, thanks, I'll consider it tagged so. Take care.
![inshallah](https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/bd44b299-0fec-497b-98c3-51572f077c02.png "emoji inshallah") Or ![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/f92040fb-8686-4415-91ae-94eb4a99e124.png) Frogshallah lives on as my headcanon
CarbonScored 1 week ago • 100%
Dehumanising the enemy, literally talking about them as if they don't qualify as human, is an absurdly common approach. It's clearly an effective way of 'other'ing, but it leads to completely unrealistic attitudes like you describe. There's a line that gets crossed between bigging up your team/talking shit about the enemy, and simply losing grasp of reality.
I do think it's an inherently fascistic process, and it's something I still sadly see in the left, including Hexbears, when talking about terrible people and class enemies. Obviously some are speaking in metaphor, but not everyone.
CarbonScored 1 week ago • 100%
Like you say, these are no-win situations. Sometimes, being void of money is better than going through a torturous hell 40+ hours a week, it's a shit choice, but it can absolutely be the right one.
CarbonScored 1 week ago • 100%
You're absolutely right, stupid typos.
CarbonScored 1 week ago • 100%
Fair enough, hard to verify anything ever, but it makes sense
CarbonScored 1 week ago • 100%
Brexit was entirely the product of an internal conflict in the bourgeois class, nobody cared whatsoever until it was made into an issue, but a percentage of rich fucks figured they'd get more favourable profits that way, and a different percent wouldn't.
And whenever those bourgeois conflicts happen, the rules stop applying it seems.
CarbonScored 1 week ago • 100%
CarbonScored 1 week ago • 100%
I agree fundamentally, but what about the DPRK here is an "obvious lie"?
CarbonScored 2 weeks ago • 100%
As always, this makes the faulty assumption that under capitalism, unemployed till workers will go do those things.
We already have vastly more than enough people to do those things, and people working tills is not the reason those things aren't done. So until we fix that reason, I'll take the extra 2 minutes opportunity to get to chat to a fellow human being thanks.
CarbonScored 2 weeks ago • 100%
Yeah, that is cool. And I'm definitely not arguing Trek was perfect, just that it did good things in that regard.
CarbonScored 2 weeks ago • 100%
I support this spreadsheet as a means of encouraging chuds to self-isolate themselves from treats and general culture until they realise how unhinged their ideology is.
CarbonScored 2 weeks ago • 100%
Okay?
CarbonScored 2 weeks ago • 100%
Yes, of course it does???
Putting minorities in media and showing them as respectable equals is not tokenism, and is doubly important to do when real life doesn't reflect that. Rodenberry did not have the power to fucking solve racial oppression, he incorporated all nationalities to showcase the importance and futurism of not being a racist fuck.
CarbonScored 2 weeks ago • 100%
Like a reverse sisyphus, you never want to come down the hill.
CarbonScored 2 weeks ago • 100%
These people always want the exact same .jpg of a woman's face and boobas, no individualism allowed. Any time even a fictional woman deviates slightly from the almighty hotwoman.jpg then they are deemed political and must be conformed.
CarbonScored 2 weeks ago • 100%
letting private industry profit from government
Or as it's sensibly called in 99% of cases, embezzlement
CarbonScored 2 weeks ago • 100%
Of those countries, only Argentina exceeds the US beef consumption.
CarbonScored 2 weeks ago • 83%
Per capita, the US consumes the most poultry, the third most beef (second to Argentina and Zimbabwe), and the most Beef and Pork combined. Exclude fish and the US outstrips the next country by about 30kg/capita/year.
Depends a lot on how meat is prepared (and I can't find good sources on that), and your definition of steak. But given the enormous excess by which the US eats steak-y meats compared to others. The US is almost certainly either 1st or 2nd.
CarbonScored 2 weeks ago • 100%
I mean I doubt any country could credibly lay claim to invention of "slab of meat". But I'd bet America is the biggest consumer of steaks.
CarbonScored 2 weeks ago • 100%
I'm increasingly convinced this is significant. The ruling classes are increasingly forgetting that neoliberalism only works as a facade to oppress others, and that if you actually believe it you won't get very far as a country.
An absolute many are neo-fascist libs, but some, I assume, are good people. ![a-little-trolling](https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/add5ddaa-1d34-4345-9aa1-8bbf0e30e56f.png "emoji a-little-trolling") https://lemmy.world/post/18545268 I thought it was nice to see a couple good takes out in the wild for a change (an anti-dunk tank?). Not all of the comments are perfect, but many are fighting the libs on the posting lines. ![posting](https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/d9009e45-6cde-4f80-b3f1-21586caac472.png "emoji posting") ![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/35ead9fe-37c9-47f0-a5e8-152c20374d5d.png) >@Rookwood > >The reason capitalism leads to fascism is that inevitably capitalism will lead to untenable inequality. Injustice will be too great to ignore between the rich and the rest. This will lead to populism. > >There are two forms of populism. One will seek to rectify the imbalances caused by capitalism. The other will seek to divert blame to minorities. If there were less <minorities>. then our society would not be in decay. One is much more useful to the Capitalist and so it will ultimately prevail. The capitalist will devote all resources to crushing the leftist populism up to and including directly funding fascism. > >160 upvotes • 12 downvotes ![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/ea7dee2f-01e0-44da-ab1d-24faaa54845f.png) ![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/39992545-2d13-4340-bba4-d19321ca376d.png) >Dharma Curious > >Some of the comments in this thread really tell you why it takes a novel laureate to say this. Some of y’all do not have a basic understanding of history, economic systems, or what the term reactionary actually means. > >The correct response to “neo liberal capitalism has contributed to the rise of fascism” should be “no shit, Sherlock” > >It’s truly sad that that isn’t 100% of the comments here. > >Scratch a liberal and a fascist bleed, y’all. That doesn’t mean all liberals are fascist, that means that fascism is an outgrowth of liberalism. > >And just in case y’all also don’t know what that means, “liberalism” in that context isn’t “Obama liberal, Bush conservative,” it means the political ideology of liberalism, of which both Bush and Obama were proponents of. > >ETA: I’m not engaging anymore… it’s not my job to teach y’all the difference between an economic system and authoritarian states. Also, your magic has no power here, I am an anarchist, not a stalinist. Please educate yourselves. If for no other reason, do it to make it easier to pwn the tankies or whatever the fuck > >101 upvotes • 19 downvotes ![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/8a8b84c4-df96-4ccb-9b14-f63decd79722.png) >[@DancingBear@midwest.social](https://midwest.social/u/DancingBear) > >i hate it when I hear people making the claim that it is capitalism that has helped so many people in the world with better quality of life and more opportunities and better outcomes, etc. > >Capitalism is a fucking disease that we need to rid ourselves of, it is worse than Ebola the way it infects our minds with the dumbest shit. > >You know what has made lives better for billions of people? The washing machine and the cotton gin and fucking electricity. > >Capitalism has fought against progress every step of the way. > >74 upvotes • 9 downvotes ![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/216552db-97ed-4840-b01e-44602b4bae51.png) >@njm1314 > >Well of course it has, fascism is the end result of capitalism. Some would say it’s natural conclusion. > > 63 upvotes • 13 downvotes >>BlackLaZoR >> >> fascism is the end result of capitalism >> >> I wonder what sort of echo chamber you must live in, in order to believe this >> >> 20 upvotes • 67 downvotes
This is just a short, easy-to-read paper I keep in my bookmarks and go back to occasionally. It explores, qualitatively, the various outcomes that contact with alien intelligence might have. I think it's a really cool 25-page exploration of possibilities that are fun to think about. Some choice quotes: >ETI (extraterrestrial intelligence) might attack us not out of selfishness but instead out of a universalist desire to make the galaxy a better place. >perhaps ETI make contact with Earth to welcome us into the Galactic Club but only after we complete a set of required bureaucratic tasks ![hexbear-posadist](https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/5cd2b438-e35c-4f18-a2a8-658116f979e8.gif "emoji hexbear-posadist") >They may be interested in incorporating us into their civilization so they can sell us their products, keep us as pets, or have us mine raw materials for them. >if ETI place intrinsic value on lives, then perhaps they could bring about more lives by destroying us and using our resources more efficiently for other lives My favourite section is the "unintentional harm" outcomes, which suggests the possibility that they just might squish us by accident. >One non-biological physical hazard that we could face from direct contact with ETI is unintentional mechanical harm. For example, ETI might accidentally crush us while attempting an unrelated maneuver. ![i-spil-my-jice](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/1399b8f4-765d-4ecf-ab4a-226392b903bd.png "emoji i-spil-my-jice") Can't for the life of me find where I first heard of this, but I just wanted to share it for being fun and fairly silly yet still officially worked on by NASA.
Because it's bad. It's a bad place with honestly bad posts. ![madeline-deadpan](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/c17f03e2-db62-425b-9489-b61faea72696.png "emoji madeline-deadpan") That's all.
![owl-pissed](https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/32406b6f-488e-4fa4-a50a-4df5ebc7a36e.png "emoji owl-pissed") Nah I obviously don't care, r/greenandpleasant are alright. I just thought it was funny to see my own words out there.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/feb/05/queue-new-nhs-dental-practice-bristol-st-pauls "99% of dentists across the south-west aren’t accepting any new adult patients." Getting anything but emergency healthcare in the UK is nigh impossible for much of the country now, I've been on the waiting lists of all my local dentists for over 18 months. This'll get spread around as heavily as that misleading bread line photo from the USSR, right?
You mean mass, indiscriminate air strikes aren't a good way to save hostages and actually just result in dead people???
cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/52. Lemme kick it off with the still top rated post on hexbear.net, probably worth restating for our federation friends too. > edit: this post has gained a lot of traction over the course of the last three months so I believe some clarification is needed > > this title is indeed a land of contrast, and i think the following statement should do a better job at voicing what I really meant with this post: > > people who think they can own one or several human beings and treat them as their property or capital do indeed deserve to die, preferably sooner than later, and not of natural causes; helping accelerate this process by loading a rifle with ammunition, pointing it at a slave owner and pulling the trigger is a good idea and should be done when possible. hopefully this clarified the stuff > > > > The post that announces the death of Henry Alfred Kissinger better overtake this one as the most upvoted post. > > edit:edit:The killing slavers fandom is dying! Upbear to murder a plantation owner right now!