People like you should be in leadership positions. The landscape rewards quick solutions, and quick solutions are rarely good solutions. "Whatever works" might still be a bad solution, just look at electron and that entire ecosystem.

Interesting. Im curious, what are some key areas of math that you think is the most interesting/useful for software engineering (that you would personally recommend learning)?

I will likely have some spare time in the following months and i currently plan to spend it on deepening my senses related to linear algebra and analysis.

I need that story

For those wondering, this seems to be MIT licensed. I didnt check all components.

I think you are misguided. Given your level of experience, you are not in a position to spew hot takes on software architecture.

There is something else underneath this. Did you try to use linux or something?

General advice when it comes to software is to just start. There are always different paths, depending on what type of programmer you are. My opiniom: choose simple, not easy.

This is terrible advice. Communication is the solution.

Very cool! This is the kind of stuff i want to see. Is AVR still the best choice for this? Any Risc-V ICs that can fill this type of role yet?

Of these, only zig compiles to binary code. The others are usually interpreted.

Name checks out

I would like to see proof lf this.

Can never seem to understand this reasoning. Musk seems to largely have solved the censorship problem on twitter, which could be regarded as a vital piece of modern dempcracy (along with the rest of the internet, which mostly suffer from said censorship).

While at it he weeded out some traitors, who actively sabotaged during this period. Im well aware that corporate takeovers arent something "good", but this one actually seems to make free speech a first class value.

This censorship is imposed by advertisers, which is somehow celebrated. Were talking disney, coca cola, whatever... These all want to control what you can or can not hear, and people are celebrating it?

The proper response to advertisers trying to co trol democracy is absolutely "go fuck yourself", this should be the norm.

We dont want a bunch of proprietary extensions to an open communications standard, do we? This is something positive.

That said, I dont have much hope for matrix. Implemented in python with the initial goal of "bridging every chat platform in existence" is just bound to be a disaster.

Maintaining anything beyond a couple of hundred lines in python becomes tedious imo.

The rewrite in go has been spoken about since like 2018, and matrix.org still runs synapse iirc. Synapse should have been trashed immediately after MVP demonstration.

Theres also conduit, but to be honest, i feel like the lesson here is to avoid feature creep. Safe, fast and distributed dm text chat should have been the target functionality, with a lean, mean codebase.

Thanks for coming to my ted talk

Proton is most certainly a mission critical Valve product. But, yeah, use whatever. I swear by Fedora.

Afaik, the way it currently works is by calling via javascript. Ironically, the way strings are handled in the browser is also a major performance block with rust at least.

This is perfect advice.

Not extreme at all. You have all the right to think what you want, but let others decide for themself.

Assuming danish. Need any more developers? In search for a danish software gig //swede

Or, you know... Just dont listen to the song if you dont like it?

all you ever get is bad faith debate

My fellow homosapien, the question is framed in the baddest faith imaginable.

Blockchain dev here. This is false. Blockchain ledgers are in many ways more real than fiat.

Blockchain tends to attract very shitty people, however. Loaning money that doesent exist is a fiat problem. In fact, its the point of fiat.

ISS Space station final upgrade

You gimuyd are on some wikd shit im history

Yes. Exactly. How refreshing to hear.

Sounds an awful lot like groupthink to me. Having differentiating takes is the point of philosophy.

In a sort of snarky way one might even say that studying it defeats the purpose, because of pollution and all that.

How about telling the user what is going on?

Weak attidude grounded in jealousy.

Sure. Although 'tolerance' here needs stricter defition. I would argue that the proponents of censorship are few. The victim is discourse itself, and by extent, regular imperfect people.

Absolutely. Except that the world is more complex, and there is no right answer.

The issue is not that people choose to distance themselves from the conversation.

The issue is that a powerful select few control what you do or do not hear.

Ever think about where these people come from? Isolation.

The mass censorship strategies of today only serves to divide the extremes. It fosters friction.

In my view, a sane (sanest?) policy would be to use the law as a framework of what is acceptable.

Getting billionares to silence people we do not like is not virtuous, whether it be media smear canpaigns or deplatforming.

We should care about free speech on our platforms. It is the cornerstone of civilization.

Swede here, soon to be in the same situation. American salaries are very tempting. If you dont mind me asking, what kind of work do you do? And was it hard to score a gig there? Any education? Im very curious.

?? Where source

I see op is fluent is stroke, much impress

I would also add IPFS, a REALLY cool piece of tech.

Some really interesting suggestions in this thread that i will definately look into when i find the time.

Will definately take a look, thanks.

Nice, thanks.

Yeah, im aware. Mostly mentioned to set the tone.