phonyphanty 7 months ago • 80%
Sure, I agree that "tech industry" can refer to individuals. But in this context, it's referring to corporations. That's the simplest interpretation of the headline, and if you don't arrive at that interpretation, it becomes increasingly apparent in the article.
"Nothing to do with tech" -- I disagree. The author is speaking to a specific issue of consent in how tech companies handle data and build UX. These are tech industry issues. Immoral data handling may also be an issue with Nestle, but the author isn't talking about Nestle. They also aren't purely talking about the general economic system of capitalism, because doing so would dilute their argument.
I don't know the author, but I don't think reducing the article to an effort to get "precious clicks" is fair. They're an established tech blogger, they've worked in security for many years, and as far as I know they make no money directly off of their articles. They even strongly encourage you to use an ad blocker when you enter the site.
phonyphanty 7 months ago • 90%
Nowhere in the article does the author pin blame on individual employees. "Tech industry" obviously refers to corporations, not individual contributors. The title isn't clickbait.
phonyphanty 7 months ago • 87%
What do you mean by separation of power? :)
phonyphanty 7 months ago • 83%
I feel like we're maybe getting confused about terminology here? "Redundancy" is a specific term for a specific form of dismissal. It's not a euphemism for "firing" because firing someone is a different kind of dismissal. Terms like rightsizing, reset, re-allocating resources, trimming the fat -- these are certainly euphemisms for redundancy that should be called out.
phonyphanty 7 months ago • 84%
I get the sentiment. But to me personally, "redundancy" is pretty clear and doesn't mask the pain that comes with being let go. There's also generally a difference between being "fired" and being "made redundant". Redundancy suggests that their job doesn't need to be done anymore b/c of a restructure, bankruptcy, merger, and the company needs to meet certain obligations for that redundancy not to be considered an "unfair dismissal".
phonyphanty 8 months ago • 100%
Sure is a videogame
phonyphanty 9 months ago • 100%
Cuuute. Love the colours
phonyphanty 9 months ago • 100%
Aww it's adorable. I want a guardian angel like this.
phonyphanty 9 months ago • 100%
You made me realise how similar the demi and ace flags are... I guess it makes sense since demisexuality is a type of asexuality.
phonyphanty 9 months ago • 100%
To clarify, it was released in Europe as well :)
phonyphanty 9 months ago • 100%
That's fair, I 100% agree. No matter the reason for a game's poor quality, you shouldn't let it off the hook. Especially if it's a commercial product.
Personally though, I don't think he's pretending not to have heard that point. He clarifies multiple times in the thread that he's fine with people criticising his work. Instead, he's speaking to a kind of criticism that claims -- incorrectly -- to know things about the game's development, and that offers naive solutions to complex problems. In my opinion, that kind of criticism is pretty worthless, and takes up air that could otherwise be spent discussing the game's real, concrete problems.
But I get the frustration. Bethesda's response to criticism of Starfield has been dismissive on the whole, so the director of the game coming out against some criticism is tone-deaf from a PR perspective.
Also, it seems like no-one who complains about discourse online takes the time to provide examples of what they're complaining about... So it's hard to know what exactly Emil is talking about here.
phonyphanty 9 months ago • 26%
I think it's a fair point. They're not arguing against all criticism, just the kind that comes from a place of ignorance for how games are made. There are certainly a lot of people who say things like, "why didn't the developers just do X Y Z", with no empathy for or understanding of how games get made. It's possible to criticise things without spreading ignorance.
Thoughts?
phonyphanty 10 months ago • 100%
Ah, gotcha. I do understand the anxiety about that though, it's hard to care when climate change feels so permanent and inevitable.
phonyphanty 10 months ago • 100%
Sorry, but that's a pretty arrogant thing to say
phonyphanty 10 months ago • 100%
Even if they won't care, it's normal to want a better future for the people who come after you.
phonyphanty 10 months ago • 87%
I'd love to, but none of my friends use it unfortunately
phonyphanty 10 months ago • 100%
Don't tell the furries
phonyphanty 11 months ago • 100%
I was really worried about this game from the trailer but this is actually looking sick as hell... I like that they're playing with different kinds of monsters and environments. And co-op sounds like a lot of tense shouty fun.
phonyphanty 11 months ago • 100%
I dunno -- I'm sympathetic to the DLC argument, but bad performance isn't something I can forgive on launch day. I'm sure they'll patch it in time, but if I buy a full-priced game, I expect it to run decently well. Anything less makes for a poor user experience. If a publisher truly cares about user experience then they won't release a game in that state, or if they do, they'll make it 100% clear on the storefront that the game has performance issues.
phonyphanty 11 months ago • 100%
Racism and lack of bipartisan support were likely huge factors as other commenters said. There was also division between Indigenous people regarding the efficacy of the Voice to Parliament. Some saw it as a great step forward, others saw it as toothless or symbolic, others still believed it would delegitimise their sovereignty over the land. The Opposition latched onto this for their own gains I believe. Together with Fair Australia (conservative lobbying group) they dealed in fear, misinformation and distrust. They absolutely dominated over social media and took control of the narrative very quickly. This became a lot easier for them due to the cost of living crisis. Take a White Australian in the outer suburbs or rural areas, tell them to care about this thing they don't understand instead of their rising mortgage payments and cost of groceries, when the Opposition is feeding into their latent ignorance and distrust of First Nations people that all Australians have, and you've lost them already.
phonyphanty 11 months ago • 100%
I grieve for you 😭🌭
phonyphanty 11 months ago • 100%
I'm guessing you're not from Aus. Weird to think that democracy snags are a purely Australian thing... If I didn't eat a sausage after voting I don't know what I'd do with myself. Our democracy might as well collapse
phonyphanty 11 months ago • 100%
Sorry man, but that's not racism. That's equity. Some kinds of people need certain kinds of privileges, because they've been disenfranchised by a racist system for years and years and years. Giving them a leg up is a reasonable and empathetic thing to do.
phonyphanty 11 months ago • 100%
It's definitely coming as a browser feature, Mozilla has confirmed it :) https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/review-checker-review-quality
phonyphanty 12 months ago • 100%
How so? Personally I don't see AI watermarks as having the same adverse effect as malware.
phonyphanty 12 months ago • 90%
Right, I see what you mean, so there'd be a power imbalance there. From my perspective, if drivers buddy-buddied with each other to that degree, customers would just flock back to Uber and the business would tank pretty fast. It would be more beneficial for the drivers to treat their customers well.
phonyphanty 12 months ago • 100%
Haha, how are those quotes relevant? This just reads like nonsense to me
phonyphanty 12 months ago • 100%
How come?
phonyphanty 12 months ago • 100%
How come? :)
phonyphanty 1 year ago • 100%
For sure. That's just how articles have to be titled to get clicks unfortunately. It can be annoying, but it helps keep journalism alive, so you take the good with the bad.
phonyphanty 1 year ago • 90%
The author's arguing that BG3 makes Starfield look like a shallow RPG by comparison. Their broader point is that Starfield is behind the times compared to most RPGs released in the last couple decades, even compared to something like Fallout 3.
phonyphanty 1 year ago • 100%
Aw man, that's kinda mean. But I sort of get where you're coming from. A company owns exclusive rights to the .sucks TLD, so I guess in a way they're profiting off of hatred. I just don't really think it's that big of a deal. Like, if I'm angry at something I'm not gonna buy a domain for it... Especially since these are so expensive. Barely anyone buys domains. Seems like it's more tailored to marketing campaigns than anything.
phonyphanty 1 year ago • 100%
What do you mean by that?
phonyphanty 1 year ago • 50%
That just makes it harder to read :( I think the original sentence is grammatically fine.
phonyphanty 1 year ago • 100%
I agree with other commenters' definitions of sovereignty. In Australia there are competing sovereignties. An imperial one -- "Australia", conquest, absolute power. And an Indigenous one -- spiritual connection, ancestry, sacred ties. In each of these sovereignties, the word "sovereignty" has a different definition and is deployed for a different purpose.
Indigenous sovereignty existed for 60 millennia, and then the British stole the land and denied that sovereignty in place of their own. The Australian state has the means to enforce its own sovereignty through things like laws, police, prison, disenfranchisement, poverty, but Indigenous sovereignty still exists. This is a fact. If I stole something from you and claimed it as my own with a threat of violence, it'd still be yours, even after thousands of years.
Under Australian sovereignty, you're certainly a citizen. Under Indigenous sovereignty, it's more complicated, and from what I understand Indigenous people have a variety of perspectives. I haven't heard anyone use the term 'guest', but I have heard 'invader'. It's an uncomfortable label, but it's entirely reasonable given the colonial history of Australia. Others have more inviting perspectives on this conflict between sovereignties.
Here's an article about it if you're interested: https://www.smh.com.au/national/what-s-indigenous-sovereignty-and-can-a-voice-extinguish-it-20230113-p5ccdk.html
phonyphanty 1 year ago • 100%
Curious about this, what makes it computationally expensive?
phonyphanty 1 year ago • 100%
To be honest, that's pretty lame. It sounds like just because you feel weird about them calling you a guest, you won't accept their clear sovereignty in Australia.
phonyphanty 1 year ago • 100%
What do you mean by the new way?
phonyphanty 1 year ago • 100%
Yeah fair enough, I can see why you'd get into it. I think the humour wasn't for me and I found the plot to be too low stakes. Art was great though.
Finished Oxenfree II, completely agree, writing was excellent. Characters are far more complex and the story was super thematically rich
phonyphanty 1 year ago • 100%
A bit of Oxenfree II. It's good so far. Their previous game Afterparty was a pretty limp experience IMO, but they've won me back. It's been a weirdly nostalgic time and the writing is solid. It leans on much of the lore of the first title, which means the mystery isn't so interesting this time around. But we'll see how it goes, it might surprise me.
Personally I think they're a bit crackpot but I'm also obsessed with them... They're like really good fanfiction. Making Deltarune an episodic game has made it endlessly fun to speculate about