morphballganon 2 days ago • 80%
Is this talking about a specific product?
morphballganon 4 days ago • 87%
Sock yarn?
That stuff in the pic is much too thick for socks
Pretty sure this was made as-seen OR photoshopped, not dyed.
morphballganon 5 days ago • 100%
morphballganon 1 week ago • 100%
CoCo
morphballganon 1 week ago • 100%
Forbidden ice cream sandwich
morphballganon 2 weeks ago • 100%
Strange card to be in Duskmourn
morphballganon 2 weeks ago • 100%
Uh, what game character dresses like that?
morphballganon 2 weeks ago • 100%
Curses aren't Innistrad-specific. Amonkhet has some very flavorful ones.
morphballganon 2 weeks ago • 100%
Guy's cloak makes his torso look disproportionately large compared to his legs... but I guess he's a tall, thin, old guy who wears a big cloak
morphballganon 2 weeks ago • 100%
The '80s called, they want their tour guide back.
morphballganon 2 weeks ago • 100%
Resolution is kind of low, kind of hard to read, I think the bottom Swamp and Mountain are by Nestor something? Those are gorgeous
morphballganon 2 weeks ago • 100%
The art in this set is killer
morphballganon 2 weeks ago • 100%
Alone, the downside of sorcery speed is significant, compared to Grapple with the Past. Discarding Altanak for a land could be worthwhile though.
morphballganon 3 weeks ago • 100%
I figured the former, but I am a poly person who knows poly ren faire people.
morphballganon 3 weeks ago • 100%
I was wondering what rating such a creature would get from the Council of Colors.
morphballganon 3 weeks ago • 100%
Sounds like a fun job.
I wonder what rating a black/green flying vigilance would get.
morphballganon 3 weeks ago • 100%
It seems to be an illustration of anthropomorphic animals in a tavern setting.
I love this kind of community in theory, because I love learning about how things work, but I don't love the posts asking for creature identification. Those are less how things work and more "I need an expert on this geologic region's fauna" so they seem like completely different topics to me. I don't want to see spiders in my feed, but I'm happy to see curious objects. If I block the community due to the spiders, I miss out on the curious objects.
morphballganon 3 weeks ago • 100%
they could have spared you
That translates to less money in their pockets though
morphballganon 3 weeks ago • 100%
People who buy cards want assurance their cards will remain legal.
The following happened to me no fewer than three times when I played standard:
New card comes out, and seemingly does ok
I don't buy any
Card starts to dominate
I try to play around them
I constantly lose, and cave
I buy a playset
Card is banned
morphballganon 3 weeks ago • 94%
Right, which qualities are those?
morphballganon 3 weeks ago • 90%
Which qualities draw you to the worst ones?
morphballganon 4 weeks ago • 100%
Dropped your /s
morphballganon 4 weeks ago • 100%
My in Thailand what?
morphballganon 4 weeks ago • 100%
Shucks, we missed our chance to do this at the RNC
morphballganon 4 weeks ago • 100%
Try sorting by new, and removing any recent additions to your block list
Just started today. Possibly related to the recent updates. Swiping to back out still works, at least for images v1.0.190
After editing a comment, UI fails to load the next page. Haven't tested if it's only in non-native instances. Anyway, if I want to review an edit, I have to hit back twice, refresh, then scroll to find my comment again.
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
I'm all about insulting pathetic losers like him, but the content of this picture isn't what makes him a loser. Gutting Twitter, releasing that horrible car and being a sexual abuser are what make him a loser.
No offense to other guys with long hair who wear leather.
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
Pide?
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
I mean, kinda hard not to, being naked and all
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
Zaheer is cooler than Unalaq for sure, but Amon and Kuvira are even cooler imo.
Looking at the blown-up thumbnails while waiting for the full-size images to load is pretty uncomfortable for my eyes... they search for detail that isn't there yet, and get strained. If there was an option to just see a spinning wheel or similar, I'd choose it in a heartbeat. Alternatively, displaying the image line by line as it loads (slow scan from top to bottom) would be even better, as it would allow me back out before loading the whole thing.
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
Don't these usually have text summaries?
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
Also her eyes glowed faintly for the following week
I have so many questions. What part of the eye? What color? How?
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
Otherwise, they'd lower the price to whatever someone can pay.
Not necessarily. You'd have to look at vacancy rates. But even a city-wide statistic won't be very useful because it looks at low- and high-income units alike. Fancy new buildings have higher vacancy rates due to higher prices. If you had some way to isolate the vacancy rates of high-income buildings, I think you'd see there are quite a few vacancies.
So if a lawyer cannot afford the rent, who can??
Lawyer salaries are not universally high. The idea that lawyers make a lot of money comes from the top lawyers. Don't look at "average" lawyer salary, as the mean of a set of data can be heavily skewed by outliers.
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
The white legendary frame really does not look good next to the white border.
But otherwise I like the white border. Snow-Covered Wastes in particular looks excellent.
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
I saw at least two new weapons not in the original, and yet, the ARMS section of the hud still lists only 2-7
What does "all systems" mean?
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
Card on the battlefield?
Why not just make it a token artifact you create? So it can't be removed?
This card is declaring cards on the battlefield to be permanents, thus the list of permanent types expands to include "card" now.
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
Try again, there was a new update about this.
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
New update fixes redgifs issue! Thanks Neko!
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
New update fixes the redgifs issue! Thanks Neko!
I just upgraded from a Galaxy J7 to a Pixel 3, which seems to have fixed the following problems: * Clicking on my profile shows me someone else's profile * Refreshing immediately after changing profiles results in no block list being applied So, it seems those issues were specific to older hardware. I am still seeing the issue where trying to save redgifs videos in-app only saves a stub file instead. Though, seeing as redgifs made their videos unsaveable in browsers, maybe this is due to deliberate site shenanigans. Voyager seemingly also can't do this. Though, Voyager doesn't download anything at all, as opposed to Connect's stub files. If the resulting file is non-functional, I think saving nothing would be better, ideally with an error message saying the file could not be saved.
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
Well that art is a throwback
I mentioned this in a comment but I figured it would get lost there. The recent update means redgifs videos now load (yay) but reveals a new problem: videos cannot be saved in-app. Attempting to do so (with file permissions enabled) instead saves a tiny file with the same name, but none of the data. As redgifs disallows saving from their site in-browser, this effectively makes redgifs content unsaveable. Any solution or workaround would be appreciated.
morphballganon 1 month ago • 100%
I was responding to the last sentence of the OP post, which is talking about Mario actors not in this poll.
Hello everyone. I recently learned there are a handful of people in my community who engage in non-barriered intercourse by default (sex with multiple partners without condoms). I try to keep to only one non-barriered partner, to minimize any STI spread that may occur. Though testing is important, there are risks that 1. A test may be wrong, and 2. An infection can be introduced and spread after a successful clean test. Also, my partner has a history of getting BV if her non-barriered partner(s) have other non-barriered partners. So, we keep it to only one non-barriered partner (for intercourse). Any thoughts on this? Is it ethical to have more than one? Is it sustainable to only have one?