lambalicious 3 days ago • 100%
Oh man this is fun. I remember we had another meme here, uuuh what was it "twice as wide en passant"? What ever happened to that?
lambalicious 4 days ago • 100%
This definitively was not in my 2024 Bingo card:
Republicans masking
lambalicious 4 days ago • 100%
IDK how easy it still is these days.
[packagemanagername] install xnest
, tbh.
lambalicious 1 week ago • 100%
Hell, trolls could go around and recreate accounts on the top 100 instances with the same username users have on other instances to prevent them from reusing the same username elsewhere, just that is a weird concept to explain
Yes but that doesn't mean you should get automatic dibs on a name everywhere. It's just a name. If you are Joe Bill at lemm.ee, that does not give you any rights over the name Joe Bill all across the world. Statistically speaking, there's at least 18 thousand other Joe Bills around at this very moment.
Like, this is something that is already solved by the instance's moderators.
lambalicious 1 week ago • 100%
Well, what’s stopping someone else from adopting TomHanks@Lemm.ee?
There's over 1400 people solely in the US named Tom Hanks. Tom Hanks The Celebrity does not get patent rights or trademarks or copyrights on the name.
Wanna know which is the Tom Hanks The Celebrity? Check if their profile is authenticated against their personal website, à-la-Mastodon.
lambalicious 1 week ago • 100%
Considering the executors of the estate were not doing it, I'd say someone has to do it.
lambalicious 1 week ago • 100%
¡Gracias por la versión en Español!
lambalicious 2 weeks ago • 100%
A toot is literally the sound of a birb. It's got more comfy than "tweet" does.
lambalicious 2 weeks ago • 100%
Yeah definitively sounds like even more support for Rust and/or Python in this sense.
lambalicious 2 weeks ago • 100%
True, but mindful: one data (well, one datum, to compare with one anecdote) does not statistics make.
lambalicious 2 weeks ago • 90%
Languages
C.
Frameworks
C.
That said, Python and Rust are great for setting up "starting up" / "small task" apps and growing up from there.
lambalicious 2 weeks ago • 100%
Sounds like a good idea in theory, but in practice would kill the entire usefulness of the subscribed view if people have to subscribe to entire magazines / communities / whatever only to vote on one particular stuff in them that is relevant to them.
lambalicious 2 weeks ago • 100%
Oh, and for the record, linux is ALSO a confusing hot mess for the average person. But until linux developers accept this,
I've heard the same kind of stuff about lots... lots of things that "will never catch on". Every one of those doomsayers were wrong. Some of them unfortunately, but still, they were all wrong.
lambalicious 2 weeks ago • 100%
God I wish someone went and finally fixed that. It's incredible that of all the FOSS and community stuff you can find on the internet, lemmy is the big one that can't even remotely be browsed via w3m / elinks / anything-without-Javascript.
lambalicious 2 weeks ago • 100%
If this later returns as ed.ch
(more streamlined and lightweight, minimal featureset, perhaps not even the ability to store remote files so as to avoid the CSAM issues, etc) it'll be The Day.
lambalicious 2 weeks ago • 100%
This is cursed in a cool way, and viceversa.
(Me, I'm just using POSIX / regcomp; dunno if there's a handy C++ wrapper for it)
lambalicious 3 weeks ago • 100%
I would hav thought stuff like Lemmy would have configurations to eg.: not allow to upload images locally, only hotlink.
Anyway, an alternative is "zero knowledge" storage, where you don't know what you are storing (hence, you can't "choose" what to host or not host either). Another alternative is disjoint storage, where two different servers store different halves of a file (eg.: an Odd Bytes server and an Even Bytes server), but this means now it's necessary to hit more servers to recover a file.
But the sensible thing to do IMO is to apply "common carrier" concept. The water distribution company is not, to my knowledge, held liable when something happens like you fill a bucket of water and share it with someone else.
RFC 3339, the "alternative" to ISO 8061, was extended to RFC 9957, which also allows adding interpretative tags. Sounds like unnecessary complexification to me. What is wrong if anything with "2024-04-26"?
lambalicious 3 weeks ago • 100%
(shhhh no me recuerdes que soy viejo XD)
lambalicious 3 weeks ago • 100%
All that is needed is a way to find what you want and a solid system of building trusted profiles with ratings and such.
Wouldn't the second part require a trusted means to verify that a given profile actually sold you the promised thing, as well as some trusted means (two-party signing, maybe) to announce that a payment actually took place?
lambalicious 3 weeks ago • 100%
El pc no vuelve a prender. No tengo idea por qué si lo apagué por la buena.
¿Has probado reiniciándolo? /#SoporteTesnico
lambalicious 3 weeks ago • 100%
¿Cómo despertaron hoy? Desenchufaron sus smartphones y sus chatgpt de la internet ya?
lambalicious 3 weeks ago • 77%
XMPP is the way.
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 100%
aeooooooooooo~
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 100%
*sips coffee while waiting for the 1.0 release*
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 50%
It's certainly and obviously not, but:
- YT is not anywhere near the "literal only possible way". Heck, air TV still exists!
- even tho it isn't, I don't see you nor anyone acting to that extent, instead you go on a self-defeatist-for-everyone attitude.
Does Youtube have a monopoly and network effect? Sure, absolutely, and someone's gotta correct that. But it's not a complete monopoly in the sense of "if you don't eat you die". If the main supermarket in the area doesn't like me because "boobs" or something, I can still go to a minimarket.
...Look, you really get tiresome. I'd ask if you are fine but honestly you are not my problem. If you need serotonin or something, get you seen; don't try to drain mine.
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 80%
"Fedi"
Already more than 50% shorter.
In comparison, asterism symbol (and any proposal that further extends into Unicode's emoji area) still spends three, maybe four bytes.
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 100%
What I'm hearing here is
Proposal to add current Fediverse symbol to Unicode
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 50%
I mean , not with that attitude certainly. And dog that doesn't bark doesn't eat.
But if you want to be self-defeatist, you do you. I'd thought half the point you were even here, in a platform that is not GAFAM, was that you weren't.
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 50%
and platforms who leverage network effect need to be held to different standards
Then do so. Come on. It's 2024.
Until something is seriously done, being able to at least go elsewhere has to be and is the rational option that is left.
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 100%
Cyberpunk utopias: "become cyborg"
The dystopia that is late stage capitalism: "become plastic"
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 100%
My solution for cases like this is sudo format c: /q && apt install linux
.
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 100%
If Lemmy were to integrate with Matrix the storage costs would explode exponentially, the two systems are notoriously heavy! (Lemmy is consistently the only service that fills more than 1 GB of storage in my browser and refuses to clean up).
XMPP is the true inheritor of IRC when it comes to standard, federated, self-hostable chat / messaging.
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 50%
Unless they want it to be possible that people see their content.
That's what the airwaves are for.
But no, really, Youtube is neither that open nor that essential that the people not there are Somehow Invisible on the Internet. And even if that was somehow the case, you actually don't need to upload video, you can just use a normal youtube account to comment and link your content wherever relevant "conversations" lead there.
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 100%
I apologize for not being able to find the button to Upvote Twice on lemmy. Once will have to suffice.
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 100%
I yearn to find the lost knowledge of how to do those thingies!
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 50%
Okay where is False?
lambalicious 4 weeks ago • 50%
There's like [checks notes] 2 more video platforms on the internet!
No reason these people can't post on those, or host their own.
lambalicious 1 month ago • 75%
Even nature is by nature left-biased, so if you lean left you are far less likely to get your facts wrong anyway.
I don't make the rules. It's other people who fail at life.
lambalicious 1 month ago • 100%
Yeah I mean it's basically a consequence that an upvote or a downvote can be for any number of reasons not shared from up- to down- or viceversa, and a simple voting system is ill-equipped to represent or contextualize that. Various solutions are viable, but my perspective is that if up+down-voting is here to stay, that part could be extended so that the act of voting could be this one bit more representative.
lambalicious 1 month ago • 100%
Another idea would be to just open it up and let people use any emoji to react.
Please no! XD We already have enough emoji as it is, not to mention they are comboable in non-portable ways or they change meaning according to the provider / renderer (GUN becoming WATER GUN is a good example).
But I do think there are valid "reaction sets" that could be interpreted with emoji, and pretty much all of them happen to match the examples you have provided:
Positive reaction / Upvote ; Negative reaction / Downvote.
Reaction of commiseration / offer of emotional support / "Hug" or w/e.
Reaction of joining in activity / offer of technical or factual support / "Let's do this".
Fun; Unfun
Reaction of surprise / "TIL" / "wow".
Factually correct ; Factually incorrect.
Reaction of "same", "this tbh", "mood" or other such neologisms
Ofc I prefer the reactions are biased towards promoting good interaction; I really don't see much use for reactions like "hostile / rude", "removed", "kys" or stuff like that. Downvote and, depending on the case, Factually Incorrect and Unfun deal with most of that.
Today in our newest take on "older technology is better": why NAT rules!
Hablando en serio. Todo el mundo habla de lo mal que está la educación, que los profesores, que los estudiantes y blah blah, y no estoy en desacuerdo que hay cosas ahí que están mal. Me podría mandar un ensayo en cómo no puede ser que una manga de pendejos de 12 vengan a amenazar a un profe en la sala. O que las salas en cuestión no deberían tener más de 20 alumnos. Pero igual hay temas de *método* y de *material* de fondo, como este. ¿Por qué no es más común en Chile enseñar las cosas de una manera más atractiva? O al menos, más inmersiva que "copie el texto aprobado 131 veces". O, no sé, cuando yo estaba en la media la manera que nos enseñaban castellano era penca (ni qué decir del inglés) pero pucha que aprendimos harto el un (1) (uno) semestre que nos hicieron escribir *y ejecutar* una obra de teatro.
Hey everyone I was wondering how do you spice up your cursors, icons, themes, etc., In particular for desktop environments such as XFCE, Mate. Are there any good repositories to use? I've taken a look at a number of apparently cloned sites like "xfce-look.org", "kde-look.org", "gnome-look.org", but while they seem to show a wide offering of themes, it seems downloading from them is blocked via uBO since it reports a "fp2" fingerprinting script without which apparently downloads are not enabled. **Are those sites trustworthy?** They seem to be associated to a "OpenDesktop" initiative of which the only reputation I can find is that they were added to EasyList Privacy blocklist. If there are other alternative hubs or repos from which to theme a distro (as agnostically as posisble) that'd be welcome info. Cheers. Thanks. Et cetera.
publicado de forma cruzada desde: https://lemmy.world/post/9470764 > - ISO 8601 is paywalled > - RFC allows a space instead of a T (e.g. 2020-12-09 16:09:...) which is nicer to read.
I've seen the Wikipedia article on year 9 doesn't mention anything of relevance happening during November. Closest thing seems to be September. Since people around have spent a few years making lots of ruckus about how the date with "9, 11" has some sort of importance as a date, I was wondering if I'm missing something here.
Basically title. 2019 edition of the Standard denotes the "T" prefix to time as mandatory (except in "unambiguous contexts"): `01:29:59` is now actually `T01:29:59`, with the former form now designated as an alternative But date does not have a "D" prefix, not even in "ambiguous contexts". `1973-09-11` never needs to be something like eg.: `D1973-09-11` Anyone know the reasoning behind this change and what is the intended use? The only time-only format with separators that I can think would be undecidable in ambiguous contexts would be `hh:mm` which I guess could be mistaken for bible verses?
En English pero bueno, qué se le va a hacer. Hoy que se unen las coyunturas de los 50 años del golpe y la dictadura, el cambio climático, y los socavones de los edificios en Valpo, este artículo se ve particularmente relevante. Si no hubiera sido por el golpe, quién sabe, Long Chile AU o tal vez podríamos haber sido una potencia mundial de la sustentabilidad climática.
No lo había visto por acá así que aprovecho de compartirlo. La noticia la vi originalmente reposteada en lemmy.world, pero no los voy a someter al uptime de ese servidor xd.
I mean, it's the obvious choice. So why not? Maybe we can do with the zoom on the cat if there is a better version.