The Lily Foundation gives away a lot of money. It's hard to see how a pharmaceutical company can gain influence by paying off some parks. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Read the article before you comment. No one needs your ignorant comments.

There is an audio segment and transcript.

Wow. How old are you?

Merci.

You think that a majority of humans are dumber than most humans, which says about as much as I think I need to know about your critical thinking skills.

My defense (defense of what?) was not "butbut there are a lot of them!" (why did you use "there are" and then "there is" in subsequent sentences?). Rather than defending anything, I was pointing out how you wrote something stupid. The larger the group you are talking about, the less precise you can be and the less likely what you are saying is accurate. You managed to choose one of the largest targets you possibly could demographically and wrote a sweeping generalization which is just stupid. I don't have to defend anything: you have to defend writing something so stupid and you can't because it's just stupid. You write stupid things.

And mobile is by far the majority of page views on the web

Really? Do you have a citation for this?

There are billions of Christians. This is stupid.

"They"?

That's correct: if you wanted an NC exclusion, I would upload it to the NCCommons, but it would not be used on Wikipedia, etc. Whatever you chose to do is obviously 100% legit, no pressure. You may want to consider how having a photo out there on Wikipedia could be marketing for you as well.

I love this. Would you be willing to license the photo CC BY 4.0 so I could upload it to the Wikimedia Commons? (See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/COMM:LICENSE)

enshittified ???

I have heard for years and years that "the other parts of 4chan" than /b are good, but I've never seen it myself.

???

If you didn't read it, then don't comment. The Internet does not need more ignorant takes.

How is this a meme?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=tankie&ia=web

I thought it was pretty obvious, since there is so little actual content in the post, but I guess you're right. Thanks.

With whom did he share these documents?

It was wrong and it should be not wrong. Odd that that is a controversial statement and that you used Reddit-level reasoning about a dissertation when someone just wants others to not spread untruths.

He also was not sentenced. This post is misinformation.

I am genuinely disappointed that on an ostensibly science-related message board I see comments along the lines “this isn’t actually true, but it kinda-sorta is, therefore, inaccurate claims somehow aren't misinformation”. If all kinds of counter-factual things were true, then all kinds of things would be true: what is the point of this hand-waving to defend something that is riddled with untruths? Also, with whom did he purportedly share these documents? In 22 words, this person got no fewer than two things wrong and you are carrying water for what reason?

So?

It is not true that he was sentenced to 35 years in prison by US authorities for transferring and sharing scientific articles from JSTOR. It is true that he killed himself.

It makes two claims and he did commit suicide. Also, my keyboard is broken. :/

Please don’t spread misinformation.

Edit: Why is anyone downvoting this? The text is inaccurate and should not be posted.

No one said that it is all like that, but enough of /b/ is so gross as to taint the reputation of the entire site. Allowing some of the stuff that is on there is enough guilt by association, even if some of the other boards have better discourse.

There are already comments claiming this, thanks.

Except when it was on 4chan and it was actual Nazis just being Nazis. So no, not blatantly sarcasm.

I only know it as “I approve of this”, not “lol, I don't approve of this, but I say I am to be hilarious”. This is the danger of adopting this Nazi Internetspeak to be funny.

There’s no reason to be rude. See Rule 1.

"Based"?

Admirable; praiseworthy, especially if the thing that is considered "praiseworthy" is unpopular or controversial.

https://www.colorhexa.com/aa0000 in case anyone is wondering.

How is that not probable?

I can respect that.

Courtesy: https://hachyderm.io/@cvennevik/111962447052823265

Posted a listing of engineering video games.

No and it's not worse service.

Probably not. Do games on the Epic Store cOSt TwIcE aS MucH? Do you routinely buy goods and services with irrelevant features to your needs?