That's already happening. Slightly different example, but Home Assistant has an integration that gives an LLM of your choice control over your home automation devices. Just talking to your home in natural language without having to memorize very specific phrases is honestly pretty powerful, as long as it works correctly. You can say stuff like "hey it's a bit dark in the office", and it just knows to either switch on the office lights, or make them brighter if they're already on

Are you seriously equating security software running on business systems with state violence / surveillance on people? Those two things are not even remotely comparable, starting with business systems not being people that have rights

Does anyone actually think that day 5 of a work week has a zero or even negative productivity value?

The rationale is that productivity increases a lot on the remaining four days if employees can actually relax and get private shit done over a 3 day weekend. I do see that this is probably gonna work differently for things like factory line workers, but for office jobs I can totally see this work

Statūs, bitte

Check for yourself: https://gitlab.futo.org/keyboard/latinime/-/blob/master/LICENSE.md

You can release modified versions as long as they're non-commercial and follow a couple of additional rules.

Ich bin draußen von der Schleife, was ist da in Essen passiert?

It's in the description of the video, the canopy locking pin wasn't locked and she failed to notice during visual checks

It looks like they opened the door normally, until the motorcycle got caught on it and forced it all the way open

Gotcha, thanks for explaining!

Wait how is what you're proposing different from ICE hybrids?

the religion that gets you the most stuff in the afterlife.

I think it would be rather the opposite, should be the one that promises the worst fate in the afterlife to non-believers

Iirc,mass effect lets you buy anything you miss in a store later, at least

Except if you continue reading beyond your Quote, it goes on to explain why that actually doesn't help.

is a pretty good indication that the author(s) are deeply racist

Or, maybe, they're just using the most well-known instance of fascism in history as a concrete example, in order to not overcomplicate the message. Jumping to accusations of racism at the slightest suspicion is not gonna help anyone.

Companies and their legal departments do care though, and that's where the big money lies for Microsoft when it comes to Windows

Training and fine tuning happens offline for LLMs, it's not like they continuously learn by interacting with users. Sure, the company behind it might record conversations and use them to further tune the model, but it's not like these models inherently need that

Na ja, dein "wer da drinne das 2fa feature nutzt hat das konzept von 2fa nicht verstanden" klingt – gerade für Laien – schon sehr nach "dann kann man es auch gleich lassen". Das wollte ich nur richtig stellen.

wer da drinne das 2fa feature nutzt hat das konzept von 2fa nicht verstanden.

Das würde ich nicht so hart sehen, 2FA im PW-Manager ist immer noch um Welten besser als kein 2FA, und für viele Normalos kannst du nichts komplizierteres als das empfehlen weil sie es sonst halt gar nicht benutzen würden.

Passwörter können auf verschiedenen Wegen in die falschen Hände geraten, 2FA im Passwortmanager schützt immer noch prima gegen alle davon, außer halt wenn der Passwortmanager selbst geknackt wird. Und wenn das passiert, ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit hoch, dass der Angreifer es eh auch schon in eins meiner Geräte reingeschafft hat, und somit auch Zugriff auf eine etwaige getrennte 2FA-App hat. Um das zu verhindern, muss es dann halt wirklich schon die Yubikey-Lösung sein, was aber wiederum aktuell nichts ist, was die Non-Techies in meinem Leben realistisch tatsächlich benutzen würden.

Edit: für meine Argumentation ist es wichtig dass du nicht ohne eins meiner Geräte in den PW-Manager reinkommst, aka das Modell von 1Password. Ich glaube Proton Pass ist nicht ganz so gut abgesichert, weil deine Daten da nur mit dem normalen Account-Passwoet verschlüsselt sind, nicht nochmal mit nem extra-Key

Roombas

Teslas

Burger Kings

Band-Aids

I do agree that "Legos" is wrong, but it's not because you don't pluralize brand names in this way.

The Lego group themselves, for one

And it makes sense to me that a business would leverage that data in ways to benefit themselves.

Big fat nope on that one. This is exactly what the GDPR is about. I'm giving you my data for a specific purpose, and unless I tell you otherwise, you have no fucking business using that data for anything else. Gonna be interesting to see how this one plays out in the EU.

Happened with Lone Echo for me. It's a VR game where you're in a space station, and you move around in zero g by just grabbing your surroundings and pulling yourself along or pushing yourself off of them. I started reflexively attempting to do that in real life for a bit after longer sessions

HTTP is not Google-controlled, you don't need to replace that in order to build something new without Google

There's also this part:

But Johansson's public statement describes how they tried to shmooze her: they approached her last fall and were given the FO, contacted her agent two days before launch to ask for reconsideration, launched it before they got a response, then yanked it when her lawyers asked them how they made the voice.

Which is still not an admission of guilt, but seems very shady at the very least, if it's actually what happened.

where anyone thinks it's ok or normal to recommend suicide to people

Except that's already happening even without it being normalized, there have always been assholes that are gonna tell people to kill themselves, especially if they've never seen the person they're talking to before. I don't see how this is any different.

Literally the whole thing would not have happened without the policy.

It also wouldn't have happened if a fucked up system wasn't withholding actual, reasonable alternatives that the person was clearly asking for. That's my point. Let's fix the actual problems, rather than try to silence the symptoms.

...and did you notice how everyone was outraged by that? That incident was not an issue with assisted suicide being available, that was an issue with fucked up systems withholding existing alternatives and a tone-deaf case worker (who is not a doctor) handling impersonal communications. Maybe it's also an issue with this kind of thing being able to be decided by a government worker instead of medical and psychological professionals. But definitely nothing about this would have been made better by assisted suicide not being generally available for people who legitimately want it, except the actual problem wouldn't have been put into the spotlight like this.

I don't want to create a future where, "I've tried everything I can to fix myself and I still feel like shit," is met with a polite and friendly, "Oh, well have you considered killing yourself?"

Are you for real? This kind of thing is a last resort that nobody is going to just outright suggest unprompted to a suffering person, unless that person asks for it themselves. No matter how "normalized" suicide might become, it's never gonna be something doctors will want to recommend. That's just... Why would you even think that's what's gonna happen

Maybe we should clarify what a slur is? Because to my knowledge, a slur is a term that has such negative connotations that it is considered offensive and discriminatory against a certain group of people in itself, without any additional context. You simply do not use it unless you want to insult or offend someone from that group. If a term is only offensive based on how it's used, it's just a regular insult, not a slur.

So, "can be used as a slur" is not a thing. A word is either a slur, or it isn't. Neither trans nor cis are slurs at the moment. I've never seen trans be used as an insult before. And even cis is almost never meant as a direct insult, merely as a reminder that someone is talking about things they have no lived experience with and should probably check their privilege. Yes, that can be in a demeaning way, but the goal there is not to hurt you, but to make you piss off. It's an act of self protection. Nobody is seeking cis people out and starting to call them names unless they insert themselves into trans spaces and start talking shit about trans issues. If you're doing that, and getting told off insults you or hurts your feelings, then, frankly, that's a you problem.

...yeah, it is. What are you implying?

The prefix cis- is Latin and means on this side of.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisgender

Just as "trans-" means on the other side of. It's literally just the opposite of trans.

Except the email in question is not a newsletter. Companies often use separate mail list services for important product announcements and similar things as well. Obviously there should be a process in place that removes you from these external services too when you delete your account, but I assume this is what broke down in this case

It's a new-ish term, I believe. Trying to get away from the notion that the trans experience is all negative things

It's not quite that simple, though. GDPR is only concerned with personally identifiable information. Answers and comments on SO rarely contain that kind of information as long as you delete the username on them, so it's not technically against GDPR if you keep the contents.

I mean, the "acoustic" bike doesn't even seem to have any in the first place, so...

Well you're also not going around holding written pieces of text to someone's face to talk to them in real life, yet that's how we're communicating here, and you don't seem to find that weird. It doesn't need to be the same to be a helpful analogue. Sounds from your mouth -> written text, facial expressions and gestures -> emoji/emoticons. There's actual research demonstrating that people actually do parse and react to emojis and emoticons in the same way they would to real facial expressions.

So do you also expect everyone over 12 to always keep a pokerface in real life conversations, or is this rule confined to virtual spaces for some arbitrary reason?

Seems like clients vary wildly in how they interpret this markup. This is how it shows on Sync:

And science fiction somehow can't be fascist?

I was thinking of an approach based on cryptographic signatures. If all images that come from a certain AI model are signed with a digital certificate, you can tamper with metadata all you want, you're not gonna be able to produce the correct signature to add to an image unless you have access to the certificate's private key. This technology has been around for ages and is used in every web browser and would be pretty simple to implement.

The only weak point with this approach would be that it relies on the private key not being publicly accessible, which makes this a lot harder or maybe even impossible to implement for open source models that anyone can run on their own hardware. But then again, at least for what we're talking about here, the goal wouldn't need to be a system covering every model, just one that makes at least a couple models safe to use for this specific purpose.

I guess the more practical question is whether this would be helpful for any other use case. Because if not, I hardly doubt it's gonna be implemented. Nobody is gonna want the PR nightmare of building a feature with no other purpose than to help pedophiles generate stuff to get off to "safely", no matter how well intentioned

Yeah but the point is you can't easily add it to any picture you want (if it's implemented well), thus providing a way to prove that the pictures were created using AI and no harm has been done to children in their creation. It would be a valid solution to the "easy to hide actual CSAM between AI generated pictures" problem.