Patriotic Socialism

Wow, this page looks like it was written by a literal 15 years old. They could at least make some effort to look serious, it will be evident to anyone reading that that they are full of shit.

Edit: the other link isn't any better, I understand why they would rather simply copy Prolewiki instead of writing themselves lmao

I need more info on that Kira-Bin Laden collab

I love when we get new theory.

Based capitalist scum.

No Bin Laden merch on Aliexpress

Yo wait a minute, that's the guy who had an interview with the director of "Loyal citizens of Pyongyang", I didn't know he was like that. Between him and the ACP guys I keep seeing more and more commies with fucked up views, I don't know what's up with that.

It's something I read on Prolewiki, here is the source article.

The exact quote is:

"To be honest with you, it would be better for the United States to support a Kurdish nation across Turkey, Syria and Iraq," said the National Security Council official. "It would be another Israel in the region."

And Rojava, that they literally called "another Israel in the region".

To be frank, we shall not permit the emergence of a new bourgeoisie.

We gotta be honest, they did permit the emergence of a new bourgeoisie. Nobody is gonna argue that people like Jack Ma aren't a Chinese bourgeoisie.

The important part is that they didn't take control of the state, and that it remains that way.

Real baffled by the guy saying /r/politicalcompassmemes isn't an echo chamber. That person has zero awareness.

He should issue an arrest warrant for the leaders that threatened him too.

The ongoing genocidal war poses a real threat to civilians.

I can't believe I'm living in a world where this needs to be said...

Hopefully this operation will go smoothly at least, even though I'm still expecting the worst from the IOF.

Yeah it's probably really bad. He can't keep his government with only the Ensemble + LR alliance, so he must have given her something big enough to make her change her mind, otherwise he wouldn't have bothered appointing someone that would have just been censored right away by the opposition. Very scary that we have no idea what the deal was.

The president can appoint who he wants, but if the parliament doesn't approve his choice, they will censor the government.

What that means is that he negotiated with the far-right to get them into his majority and not to vote the censorships, in exchange for who knows what. The liberals are scratched and the masks have completely fallen, there are dark times ahead.

This movie needs to be remade but with a good ending this time.

It sounds like "Gremlin", so the liberals like it because it's spooky.

So confidential that it got straight to the New York Times

It was in an interview with the Chicago Tribune.

How ungrateful do you have to be to complain when you have a dad that based.

It would actually be so funny if the first time the USA triggered the Hague Invasion Act was to rescue MrBeast.

I'm sure he would have a camera crew ready to monetise it.

Can't wait for MrBeast's trial at the Hague.

Huuh maybe stop sending israel weapons then?

Thanks! I'm adding them to my reading list.

Do you have any book recommendation on that topic?

Pour situer ce monsieur politiquement : C'est un néolibéral, fondateur de la Grameen Bank, qui a fait ses études aux USA grâce a une bourse du Département d'État des États-Unis, et qui semble avoir des liens suspects avec le NED.

On peut donc s'attendre à ce que les ressources du Bangladesh restent fermement dans les mains des États-Unis, et rien ne va s'arranger pour le peuple Bangladais.

But not 6000, right?

I can easily go through a few hundred grams of pasta every week, but I don't keep 6kg at home.

What do random dudes plan to do with 6000 rounds of ammunition?

I'm happy you found your people ❤️

I hope they have same day delivery over there.

And Iran will defend Lebanon. Who's going to defend Iran so we can keep the world war chain going?

I refuse to believe people can be THAT stupid. They have to be bots.

Pretty much everyone with a smartphone I believe. They say that in 2019 there were 1 billion compatible smartphone.

The navigation system used by the phone is transparent to the user, so of course we dont notice it, but it's up there and we're using it.

Europe doesn't even have its own version of GPS which makes it dependent on tech that essentially belongs to the US military.

Europe does have Galileo actually.

I can concur with that. Ayahuasca, in a ritualistic setting under the supervision of a trained professional, is really the only thing that provided me with long lasting relief from my depression. I tried various medications and therapists before that, with no success.

I think drug abuse is a consequence of societal problems, and criminalising drugs can only further marginalise people who are already in a tough situation.

I think governments should focus on resolving the contradictions that are at the source of those societal problems, and during that time adopt Portugal's strategy of decriminalising all drugs and providing social assistance to users in dedicated spaces.

Once we have developed a strong social safety net and we deem that the risk of people falling into drug addiction as a way to escape the sad reality of their material conditions is low enough, I think we should legalise drugs and sell them in dedicated space where people are educated about them. My reasoning behind it is that people will always be curious to try at least some drugs, and it's impossible to completely stop them for doing so. Making them legal allows us to set strict quality controls to ensure that the products aren't tainted with harmful substances (more harmful than the drug the user is expecting to buy, think fentanyl) and that the dosage is accurate. The education prior to the purchase would allow the person to know the potential risks and side effects before hand, and to be informed about the safe way to consume it.

I think that would be the most optimal solution for risk prevention.

You can't eat that kind of chips though.

I feel like I'm not living in the same century as them.

"On n'a jamais essayé l’extrême droite !!"

Ouais mais on peut peut-être regarder comment ça se passe chez ceux qui l'ont fait avant de voter n'importe comment.

blame Russia for engadging in activities that warrants sanctioning

But why though? Russia had just observed 20 years of invasion of Afghanistan by the USA, with absolutely no divestment and no sanction as a result. So the logical conclusion should be that invasion doesn't warrant sanctioning. Why would Russia be a special case? If everyone can invade everyone, it would make sense that Russia understands that it also applies to them.