Nullpointer 1 year ago • 62%
Hating on Rocky is going to be popular and he has earned a lot of it. He also did a lot to turn around a team that nobody in Chicago cared about and made them relevant again. Like most people in life, he is a complicated individual.
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
They know what they wrote
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
Everyone says they wanted a new nexus 7, we’re on our way there!
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
Without flairs this could go a couple of different ways
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 76%
Because they something to lock you in to Ubuntu. They want Ubuntu to be the only thing that uses snaps. They want to get snaps to be an Ubuntu exclusive feature, and once they can start convincing some random closed source devs to ship in only the snap format they have a hook to keep you on Ubuntu. And they want those random random closed source devs to be focused on more of the corporate world so they can sell some support licenses.
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
Download the netinst image. You get the option of installing a de or none entirely.
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
Thank you, very helpful! In this case the vm is just a file server. The bulk of the traffic is for Time Machine. In the past I had the host manage samba shares on btrfs but was exploring delegating that to a vm and playing with zfs. This is all home network admin fun, and your response gave some good info.
I run several VMs in Libvirt, host is Debian 12. I'm want to create one dedicated to Samba sharing. What is the best way to expose more disks to a QEMU host? I have 6 SSDs I want to utilize on this VM. 1. Creating a filesystem hardware node (virtiofs or virtio-9p)? 2. A physical disk exposed to the VM via a Storage hardware node? 3. Something more exotic like a zfs storage pool? Best for me is more about reliability than anything else. I have tried sharing folders before using the Filesystem hardware node and Plan 9 but it was a little wonky when it came to permissions. I may not have set it up right, however.
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
It's 1a for me as the worst decision in modern history, 1b is legalizing direct to consumer medicine marketing.
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 83%
Sorry, you need to blame apple for this /s
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
proprietary file extensions
What file extension is that?
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
I’m a Blackhawks fan… unfortunately everyone knows our owner.
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
First time in kraken history
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
Several servers did blow and had to get moved to new machines! Both lemmy.ml and lemmy.world did.
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
Sbnation’s live comments used to be good for game days until it became too corporate
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
The had a good 8 or 9 minutes there, but the have looked more like an 8 seed than not this series
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
Maybe Eichel?
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
I would guess Discord as well
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
He is going to make some cash very soon.
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
I thought I heard a whistle on the broadcast but must not have.
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
Gonna need a guest appearance by Wart to make it truly “2”
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
Probably the last one too. I can’t see them taking Crosby or Lewis.
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
6 lines on various Red Pocket annual plans for a couple of years. No complaints but I’m highly technical so I can diagnose things myself. I also am all iOS which seems to be better supported. Only complaint is that you have to open a support ticket to enable the free visual voice mail for iOS devices; it is $1 a month for other devices.
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
The math just doesn’t work with fully unbundling. I’m not defending bundling at all, but the alternative doesn’t add up. Let’s say Hulu Live has 5 million customers paying $2.75 in carriage fees for TNT (numbers from a quick web search and approximated). That means Hulu pays $13.75 million to TNT, and TNT gets that whether or not a subscriber watches TNT or not.
If TNT went unbundled and their own way ala Disney+, and only took 10% of subscribers, you’d be paying $27.50 to keep TNT going at their current carriage fees. And that’s assuming they could continue to charge the same pricing to advertisers. If their subscribers go from 5 million to 500,000, no advertiser is going to pay the rate that TNT charges now, so there is more money to make up.
Unfortunately, especially with live sports, bundling channels together is the only way it’s going to make financial sense to run a network like TNT. And that’s just factoring in Hulu, if all the other streamers and cable companies went that way it’d just be worse.
Nullpointer 1 year ago • 100%
Time. There was one time when a 65” 1080p tv would set you back $10k. Now those are Black Friday giveaways for test driving a car. By manufacturing the first units Apple can get the manufacturing time to mature on the exact specs they want which will lower costs.
Just look at the iPhone SE, it is so cheap because all of the hard work was done years ago and it’s just swapping out a chip every few years.