A source: https://www.tiktok.com/@_alexanderrose/video/7375013158093720850?

A source: https://www.tiktok.com/@tragicscience/video/7351876330293628193

A source: https://www.tiktok.com/@tuktuklover99/video/7365274837868236075

A source: https://www.facebook.com/watch?v=1070577474204753

Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiroshi_Yoshida

His other works (has many): https://www.roningallery.com/artists/yoshida-hiroshi

A source: https://www.tiktok.com/@jarnveeboo/video/7355556938500836638

ok, so basically im very smol

BoJack, stop. You are all the things that are wrong with you! It's not the alcohol, or the drugs, or any of the shitty things that happened in your career, or when you were a kid! It's you! Alright? It's you. Fuck, man. What else is there to say?

The source and more photos: https://zbiory.mnk.pl/en/catalog/530266

A source: https://www.tiktok.com/@oliversoxford/video/7344427037815344417

A source: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/544088 (currently in The Metropolitan Museum of Art in NY)

During the Late Period and Ptolemaic times mongooses were represented in bronze statuettes such as this one, standing, forepaws raised, atop small bronze boxes. The pose of raised paws signifies the animal's adoration of the sun god when he rises in the morning. Some scholars have identified these animals as otters rather than mongooses.

In myth, mongooses were particularly attached to the goddess of Lower Egypt Wadjet, whose cult was centered in Buto, in the northern Delta.

A good summary:

Source: https://twitter.com/selimyaman_/status/1772172937073709293

Actual paper on the impact of ChatGPT on adjectives: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07183

A source: https://www.tiktok.com/@justice.dodson/video/7345572741115940138

A source: https://www.tiktok.com/@mrbeardeddragon/video/7341581648984640810

A source: https://www.tiktok.com/@juliahoran13/video/7347870106644466990

An article on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cat_Drop

I've added BÉPO and AZERTY (some letters I had to keep below). I think that BÉPO actually has an interesting pattern:
https://imgur.com/a/uupLDMJ

The site has tooltips showing letter percentages:
https://deykun.github.io/diffle-lang/fr?p=about-language

Peak for other languages: English - 9, Spanish - 10, Polish - 12, German - 13

A source: https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/E_Am-7498

Textile fragment; cotton plain weave ground with paired warps; camelid supplementary weft patterning; feline figure; cream and black.

I compared all 15,920 words in my wordbase used as winning words with the same words used as starting words, and RATES is good. It ranked 6th in one of the modes.

RATES - the averages for all games: 🟩 12.55% + 🟨 23.35% = 35.90%

The first place went to:

TARES - 🟩 13.89% + 🟨 22.02% = 35.90%

And max green to:
SANES -🟩14.55% + 🟨15.95% = 30.49%

https://deykun.github.io/diffle-lang/en?p=about-language

There were some comments on Reddit suggesting that cutting the dataset at 15 and removing 40% of words was not the best move. I have locally built a version with the limit set to 30.

For the interested:
https://imgur.com/a/Rz7Cw6x

The paper: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2023.1339390/full

I only have a prespellechecked list of words from here: http://www.aaabbb.de/WordList/WordList_en.php

Thanks. It should read prefers-color-scheme. I have dark mode by default, but it's also possible to set dark/light mode too.

To clarify, it is not the total number of words but rather the number of unique words considered. Imho a million of unique words is okay. A bigger concern for me would be that words on Wikipedia can be overly specific.

A source: https://deykun.github.io/diffle-lang/de?p=about-language (It has tooltips displaying percentages for other letters)

A source: https://deykun.github.io/diffle-lang/cs?p=about-language (It has tooltips displaying percentages for other letters)

A source: https://www.edf.org/revamped-cost-curve-reaching-net-zero-emissions

A source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_pet_massacre

Ron being rude was the reason Hermione was in the bathroom when the troll attacked the school. 🙄

"Oh, well done!" cried Professor Flitwick, clapping. "Everyone see here, Miss Granger's done it!"

Ron was in a very bad mood by the end of the class.

"It's no wonder no one can stand her," he said to Harry as they pushed their way into the crowded corridor, "she's a nightmare, honestly."
Someone knocked into Harry as they hurried past him. It was Hermione. Harry caught a glimpse of her face -- and was startled to see that she was in tears.

"I think she heard you. "

"So?" said Ron, but he looked a bit uncomfortable. "She must've noticed she's got no friends. "

Hermione didn't turn up for the next class and wasn't seen all afternoon. On their way down to the Great Hall for the Halloween feast, Harry and Ron overheard Parvati Patil telling her friend Lavender that Hermione was crying in the girls' bathroom and wanted to be left alone. Ron looked still more awkward at this, but a moment later they had entered the Great Hall, where the Halloween decorations put Hermione out of their minds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1P7HQiRceas

I would encourage you to have goodwill and assume that when he spoke about Hermione being from the US, he wasn't referring to her actual origin, but rather emphasising that she had a normal background similar to his students in the US. This is how I interpreted it.

A source: https://www.tiktok.com/@profw/video/7330012834769734955

The Lion of Gripsholm Castle is a notable example of bad taxidermy located in Gripsholm Castle, Sweden. The Lion is badly stuffed and is considered to have a comically deformed face.[1]

In 1731, the dey of Algiers presented King Frederick I of Sweden with a lion, one of the first lions in Scandinavia.[2] When alive, the lion was kept in a cage near Junibacken. When the lion died, it was stuffed and mounted; however, the taxidermist and the museum-keepers had never actually seen a lion before, and did not know how they were supposed to look.[3] The taxidermist mostly based the reconstruction off of historic artwork of lions. As a result, the mount was especially anatomically inaccurate, most apparent in its face.

In the 21st century, the badly-stuffed lion has been widely mocked.[4][5][6][7][8][9]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_of_Gripsholm_Castle

A photo description:

Christopher Robin's original Winnie-the-Pooh stuffed toys, on display at the Main Branch of the New York Public Library. Clockwise from bottom left: Tigger, Kanga, Edward Bear ("Winnie-the-Pooh"), Eeyore, and Piglet. Roo was also one of the original toys, but was lost during the 1930s.

More about it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winnie-the-Pooh#History

Yes! I originally found it posted on their TikTok account:
https://www.tiktok.com/@thehuntington/video/7321812764421475630

;)

Most people don't have an issue with it. But starting each interview with a question: "Do you condemn Al-Qaeda?" is sinister. It is not a good faith question.

If you are asked this question each time you want to speak about atrocities committed against civilians and have to proclaim that you do not in fact support terrorists, you have the right to be offended. Especially when the person asking you that question cannot condemn cutting off water to civilians.

After 9/11, thousands of Arabs living peacefully in the US were asked to condemn Al-Qaeda, which they did because who wouldn't? That condemnation and support was used to justify attacking Iraq - the country where Al-Qaeda was not located in, and resulted in the death of a million people there. Imagine being an American Iraqi supporting the US's right to "defend itself" and seeing your family in Iraq and their children being killed.

There is a level of analogy here where a person with relatives in Gaza is asked by interviewers that question while trying to advocate to not cut water or bomb one of the most densely populated places in the region.

You have the right to be offended if people start asking you to condemn segregation, Nazism, or bigotry when you never claimed that you don't have an issue with those things. Especially when the person asking you is using it as a tactic while you are trying to alarm about human rights being violated, and civilians / children being hurt.

Well, in Poland, we use both terms too. But the way I checked it now is by going to the Polish Wikipedia page for "Holandia" then changing the language to German, and I moved from:

Holandia (niderl. Nederland, wym. ˈneːdərˌlɑnt ( odsłuchaj)), oficjalnie Królestwo Niderlandów (niderl. Koninkrijk der Nederlanden) – państwo położone w zachodniej Europie i południowej części...

To:

Das Königreich der Niederlande, niederländisch Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, englisch Kingdom of the Netherlands, friesisch Keninkryk fan de Nederlannen, auf Papiamentu Reino Hulandes, ist ein Staat, der aus den Niederlanden...

And German "Holland" returns:

Holland ist ein Teil der Niederlande. Man kann den Ausdruck auf die beiden (von 12) Provinzen Noord-Holland und Zuid-Holland beziehen, oder aber auf ein größeres Gebiet, das mehr der historischen Grafschaft Holland entspricht.

And "Teil" is "a part of", so I would say that map is correct.

A source: https://sg.style.yahoo.com/japanese-research-what-colours-clothing-cooler-hot-weather-062953419.html

A source: https://twitter.com/CanGeoReader/status/1720557549290655828