From what I remember, in Zoom the meeting's host needs to enable E2EE, it's not automatic, and it disables a lot of Zoom's features while also limiting the amount of participants.

I've seen them say their solar panels will provide more energy for the same amount of land at a lower cost.
But it doesn't seem like their prices are publicly available yet.

I think it's still interesting as it shows the potential.

And Oxford PV recently had a commercial sale of a perovskite solar panel with a 25 year guarantee

By adapting the formulation and synthesis of the perovskite and the cell design and encapsulation optimization, Oxford PV succeeded in mitigating stability-related deficits and aims at providing future buyers of their modules with the industry-standard 25 year performance guarantee

From the article, it looks like the focus is on the more relevant parts for hydrogen, the chemical and steel industries.
Those and long haul vehicles (planes and ships) seem like the places where hydrogen is more relevant / the only realistic option at the moment.

Copying from a previous comment of mine:

https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SE00096B

By adapting the formulation and synthesis of the perovskite and the cell design and encapsulation optimization, Oxford PV succeeded in mitigating stability-related deficits and aims at providing future buyers of their modules with the industry-standard 25 year performance guarantee

Personally I find the Glove80 very comfortable. But I also wanted it for the rest of its features. So it depends on what are you looking for in a keyboard / what are your priorities.

You can also just keep the lights off and get the blank keycaps for the Glove80.

Like the Glove80 in what way?
There's nothing else that's exactly like it.

I guess the Kinesis Advantage360 is the most similar, but it's still quite different.

The difference here is in the efficiency of the system.
And that this is an aquaponics system, which includes growing both fish and vegetables.

After more than two years of testing, Prof. Gross's system demonstrated 1.6 times higher plant areal productivity, 2.1 times lower water usage and 16% less energy consumption per kilogram of feed than conventional systems. His calculations suggest that upscaling to about one ton of fish will allow operation of the system with no need for external energy, less than 1% water exchange, negligible waste production as well as significant carbon sequestration.

China responsible for 95% of new coal power construction in 2023, report says
Unfortunately

I'm not sure what challenges wave power faces that tidal doesn't, but the Rance tidal power station in France has been operating since 1966.

CorPower Ocean announces wave energy breakthrough in Portuguese waters from March.

Edit: There's also Eco Wave Power Commences Sending of Clean Electricity to the Israeli National Electrical Grid from January.

Edit2: There's the 254MW Sihwa tidal power station

Tidal power plants aren't a new technology though, so I'm guessing you meant wave power.

From the article:

Oxford PV, a UK company spun out of Oxford University Physics in 2010 by Snaith to commercialize perovskite photovoltaics, recently started large-scale manufacturing of perovskite photovoltaics at its factory in Brandenburg-an-der-Havel, near Berlin, Germany. It’s the world’s first volume manufacturing line for “perovskite-on-silicon” tandem solar cells.

https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SE00096B

By adapting the formulation and synthesis of the perovskite and the cell design and encapsulation optimization, Oxford PV succeeded in mitigating stability-related deficits and aims at providing future buyers of their modules with the industry-standard 25 year performance guarantee

It might not be as thin as before, but is several microns of thickness not thin?
It was nice if they gave more details about exactly how thick it is at 27% efficiency though.
I'll look around to see if I can find more information about it.

Edit: And by the way, I'm actually not aware of any 27% solar panels currently in production.
Other than the ones Ofxord PV has recently begun manufacturing (established by the same Prof. leading this research).

One of the main advantages here is that this can be applied to almost any surface because of how thin it is.

From the article:

We can envisage perovskite coatings being applied to broader types of surfaces to generate cheap solar power, such as the roofs of cars and buildings and even the backs of mobile phones. If more solar energy can be generated in this way, we can foresee less need in the longer term to use silicon panels or build more and more solar farms.

Concrete is also used in buildings and other facilities like pumped storage hydropower.

Yeah it's in the description
https://liberapay.com/Bazsalanszky

Of silicon panels.
In the lab, mixing silicon and perovskites has already achieved 34%.

It's more about the use of perovskite (while retaining durability), which should lower the cost of the panels.
The efficiency improvement is a bonus.

I've been wanting to buy a Pixel for a while now (for GrapheneOS), but there's always something that bothers me too much.
This time around, the Pixel 9 pro sounds like it will be great, but I'll be waiting to see Google's custom SoC using TSMC for the Pixel 10.
I could always just get the 9 later at a lower price or used.

BlurBusters have nice articles about this.

TL;DR: Less motion blur and less artifacts (like stroboscopic effects, which can also be visible at 480hz).

And in general I didn't expect to see praise for a group that has "A Curse Upon the Jews" as part of their official slogan.

Have you seen the video about the thermoformable palm rests?
That and the interchange-able input devices are pretty neat.

It's difficult to find reviews on it though. And in general finding people who've used it.
I guess their Discord would be the best place for that.
I've also seen a few reviews on Reddit.

Been using it over a year and loved it from the beginning.
Wrote a bit more about it in this comment https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/11566566

It's also designed with custom mounts in mind, so you can really adjust it to what you prefer.

I personally ended up getting the Glove80.
I don't have experience with the Advantage 360, but there are some reviews of people who have used both and compared them.
Like this and this.

There's also the Svalboard, although it might be a step too far for you. It has options for integrated trackballs / trackpoints.

Been using the Glove80 for over a year now and I love it.
Everything about it is exactly what I wanted from an ergonomic keyboard and it's also very customizable.
It's been very comfortable for me from the moment I got it up until now. And while I used to like rough PBT keycaps texture, I've learned to enjoy the Glove80's smooth POM keycaps.
I had only one keyboard before it which I could consider as "ergo" and have used for quite a bit - The Sweep. I liked it, but the limited amount of keys ended up being an annoyance for me. Especially when gaming. Plus the Glove80's curve and palm rest make it substantially more comfortable for me, despite it being a larger keyboard.

There are only 2 things left on my checklist for the "perfect ergo keyboard":

• Lighter switches - I got the red chocs before the red pro chocs were an option. I'm thinking of soldering the 20g ambient switches though.
• Pointing input module - There was some work going on about an Orbital v2 touchpad integration with the Glove80. But I haven't heard anything about it since (I think it's been over a year).

So I've been eyeing the Svalboard.
I'm not sure it'll fit my needs as it isn't wireless and has less keys. But I love everything else about it.

Better to pirate it.
The original devs were kicked out and the current owners are scummy.

I have a bunch of games I bought a while after playing the pirated versions, and I usually don't play them at all.
I guess there isn't really a way to see how many people do this.

Are you aware AMD just announced the release of new cpus?
Just making sure, since some people will prefer to wait.

Google is also giving support for its Pixel devices since the Pixel 8 line.
And their Pixel 8a is also going to get 7 years of support, which is neat.

Hopefully others follow.

Nvidia is also currently building their most powerful supercomputer in Israel. And the CEO has also mentioned the Israeli startup Mellanox (which they acquired for 7 billion USD) as an important part of Nvidia's success.
He also said “Israel is home to world-leading AI researchers and developers creating applications for the next wave of AI,” as recently as the end of last year.
Considering that, their startup accelerator program with over 300 Israeli startups, and their 7 R&D centers in Israel (Intel has 4 facilities), I'd say that by your logic Nvidia is much more "pro-Israel" than Intel. And it's number 1 in the OP's article's list.

Don't see any Israelis in the board members or owners. Them and the founders all seem to be American. I did see Bangladeshi-born and Malaysian-born Americans on the board.

You're doing semantics with yourself.
I wrote that ByteDance is headquartered in China and was founded by Chinese. Nowhere did I write "owned by China".

Tiktok is owned by ByteDance, which is headquartered in China and was founded by Chinese.
Intel is headquartered in the USA and was founded by Americans.

Intel is investing in Israel for the same reason other companies like Nvidia do (who just acquired another Israeli startup last month and has 7 R&D centers in Israel). Innovation and talent.

Intel is an American company.

If you're bothered by Israeli involvement you should avoid all the companies in that list, including AMD, as they are all invested in Israel and have Israeli teams.
Even large Chinese tech companies like Xiaomi, which has an R&D center in Israel, are invested in Israel.

Just want to add that at the moment AV1 is only beneficial for encoding to lower bitrate videos.
It's still better to use x265 for high bitrate.

That's true. But if you look into the test, it includes monitors and has them showing footage with static elements.
At the 6 months mark, which is aprox. 2.5 years real life usage according to RTings, the monitors barely had any burn-in according to RTings - Although I couldn't see any burn-in. If you compare it to the non-OLED TVs at that mark, many of those had very noticeable uniformity (and other) issues.
So according to this test, the monitors are already doing better than LCDs.

Other than the Samsung S95C which is the newest model in their test.
16 months of extremely intensive tests which isn't how you'll use these IRL. Which is why they refer to it as "accelerated longevity test".
If you'll read a bit more about the test and the results, you'll see that all of the LCDs there are also having other permanent issues.

According to them, if your usage includes varied content, burn in won't be an issue.
If you don't, reading more about the test and about specific monitors / TVs you're curious about will give you a better idea.

Have you seen RTings' articles about this?
Like: Real-Life OLED Burn-In Test On 6 TVs
Seems to really depend on your usage, and newer ones are even better according to their latests test: Longevity Burn-In Test Updates And Results From 100 TVs