As a Dem, I'm going to say that I don't support what Bill Clinton did given their power level difference. But, I do acknowledge what Trump did was way worse, and I will always compare him negatively to whatever you come up with.

It's a fair criticism to be honest. But, I can't think of a reasonable alternative. When I support trans-individuals, usually I argue from the brain-body mapping perspective as 1) It's not based on feelings as we know that there are people whose brain mapping does not correspond with their body mapping, and 2) There's a lot of evidence to support that perspective.

A lot of people aren't just going to get "What it feels like to a man/woman.", and personally, while I identify as a man solely for my parts, I just simply lack what it means not because it supposedly matches me, but because I have no feelings associated with gender. And here's the kicker, I wouldn't understand dysphoria when called the wrong gender either. For example, my mother has always addresses me as a male because I was born with a penis and all that jazz, but recently a few months ago, in a endearing way, she told me that I was like a daughter to her, which I take to mean that I give off that energy to her. Didn't really felt off or anything either.

I stop using right as correct a while ago for a reason.

Threaten me with a good time? Ok. I will vote for Harris.

That is precisely why I asked. But, maybe I'm in the wrong assuming the color means something in this context.

I know that. But, in this context, what do they mean?

Is there a meaning to the color?

Oh, we all know why. He has already lost his mind a long ago.

Welcome back!

This doesn't have anything to do with that. More like safety reason.

Polls being wrong claim is more about how election results seem to be different than poll results. Special elections points to that.

I am not going to follow the convention. I'll just declare that it's bullshit, and that's that. I'll follow the next DNC convention if it comes up. At least Whitmer gets my attention.

Yes, I know. In my experience, it is usually assumed that attacks on Israel means the non-government entities are targeted too. I had to explain to them about about separation, and hell, I even separate leadership of IDF from lower ranks.

I'm an AOC supporter, here's the thing: She demonstrates a separation of Jewish people and Israel government. I support that. In addition, I noticed that Israelis can't seem to tell attacks on Israel from uninvolved people is more directed at government. I always knew attacks on US were directed at government in Bush era.

The supposed worse your score is, the better it actually is? Like landing in the most wanted in Russia is a badge of honor now.

Who caucus with the Democratic Party.

One of the parties have people like AOC, and Bernie Sanders. Those with you know, history of fighting for people. The other? Can't name any one.

Personally, I don't care if Trump and conservatives go to jail. It's not like any of their politics is anything more than imaginary white grievance and 4th Reich. They aren't a legitimate political party. They're like one of the few illegitimate political party I can count on my hand and feet.

There are some democratic politicians that might be interested into taking the offer up, but it isn't public, nor they won't reveal it. Can't name any, but I can imagine at least 1 is out there. On the other side of aisle, we already know Republicans wants to enact the fourth reich and just about all of them wants to execute their political opponents.

I read it as a infuriated CEO now wants to shoot a dancing duck because of this news.

Show us a mugshot by then.

You could argue that AIPAC is partly responsible for the mess we're in, as well as other PACs. So, I don't think that they will stop. Hell, one could hold that stance while voting for questionable politicians on their side. You just gotta make sure that the threat of being primaried remain.

This is the result of raising a leopard. Should had cut him loose.

Oh no. Anyways, have you tried turning against Russia?

Yeah, I know he will not read this.

VPNs approves of this message.

You should provide an Android version

I found this - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.boycottrussiangoods.app&hl=en_US&pli=1

Profits over morals. I wish there was more regulations.

Good luck with that, India.

This is yet another reason to vote for Joe Biden.

On a side note, to the Ukrainians, you might notice we do not mention the war or talk about it (including myself), but I am here to let you know that it warms my heart that you guys are fighting and I will contribute to keep the aid going. It might not be obvious, but we Americans still support you.

Russia is butthurt? For starters, they should leave Ukraine. And sanctions will stay until they choose otherwise. It's on Russians to decide what to do with their country.

Inb4, they plan to pose as third-party advocate.

Their priority is to control sex lives of other people instead of improving lives.

If conservatives are trying to ban something, then it's probably a good thing they were banning. Ranked voting should be more of a thing.

Warns? This is a bad thing?

Most are still going to vote for Biden as harm reduction thing. If I had and could voted uncommitted, I would. And if I were to vote for Biden, I would.

They're still here. Hell, one of them praises Lebanon is fighting a good fight, and I pointed out Hezbollah isn't exactly what you should support. In addition, get this, I'm not even anywhere near being pro-Israel, but rather anti-ME(Middle East) as a whole as they have culture of grudges and war crimes and hyper-religiousity.

The expulsion of Jewish people in the past?

Morocco 1948: 265,000 Morocco 2007: 2,000

Algeria 1948: 140,000 Algeria 2007: est. 50

Tunisia 1948: 105,000 Tunisia 2007: 1,700

Libya 1948: 38,000 Libya 2007: 0

Egypt 1948: 75,000 Egypt 2007: 20

Lebanon 1948: 24,000 Lebanon 2007: 100

Syria 1948: 30,000 Syria 2007: 100

Iraq 1948: 150,000 Iraq 2007: 10

Could go on, but there is definitely expulsion of Jewish people in the past. Which is pretty strong evidence Middle East hates Jewish people.

What about the expulsion of Palestinian people over the last several decades to this very day?

Two wrongs don't make a correct.

There isn’t a case for it.

Guess you miss good case. I'm actually on the side that yes, they did committed major war crimes.

Lebanon are fighting the good fight right now.

First of all, Hezbollah isn't even supported there. Second of all, Hezbollah isn't exactly what you should be endorsing.

How do you war crimes?

Stupid question. But, we see things like children under strapped vest with a bomb under it. We see rapes being used as a tools. That's the modus operandi of the Middle East of the whole.

As for any terrorism. If you come and wipe out my whole family for no reason, then I’m going to come and try to murder you too.

That's pretty much how the Middle East operates. Even without Jewish people, they're still going to come at each other throats.

So, with that being said, no, Middle East don't care about Israels' war crimes. They're proud of those things. They simply hate Israel because of well, they're Jewish.

Why are you defending Middle East? I should have to ask that question.

It's the easiest explanation. The expulsion of jewish people in the past. The observation that Islamic states endorse war crimes. Which means yes, the surrounding nations do hate "the joos" irrespective of whether Israel committed war crimes (which a good case can be made with hostages shooting and WCK bombings, etc.).

This is Middle East we are talking about. I honestly doubt that they care about war crimes when they participate in them themselves.